On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Greg Cope wrote:
> I agree but apache has regex.h ... a regex libary - hence these should
> be possible - or am I missing the point ?
My point was simply that while Perl makes easy things easy, C makes all
things hard ;)
Frankly, I prefer it as a Perl module since I can see
Hi Gerald,
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Gerald Richter wrote:
> Also there are a lot of nice libraries around, programming in C will
> always take much more time (I would say 2 to 10 times), then writing
> the same in Perl.
Good to have confirmation of my suspicions!
73,
Ged.
Hi Greg,
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Greg Cope wrote:
> I agree but apache has regex.h ... a regex libary - hence these should
> be possible - or am I missing the point ?
Actually regex.h is just a header file which contains the definitions
(functions, data structures etc) for the library. There are
> >
> > I think you're forgetting about little things like regexes and such.
Yes,
> > Perl and C share a lot of syntax, but there are many things you can do
> > easily in Perl that are brutal in C.
>
> I agree but apache has regex.h ... a regex libary - hence these should
> be possible - or am I m
Hi Dave,
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Dave Rolsky wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, G.W. Haywood wrote:
> > If you can write Perl you can write C, there are onlya couple of dozen
> > keywords.
>
> I think you're forgetting about little things like regexes and such.
Maybe glossing over, not forgetting - tha
Dave Rolsky wrote:
>
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, G.W. Haywood wrote:
>
> > If you can write Perl you can write C, there are onlya couple of dozen
> > keywords. It's just that you're not so mollycoddled in C, you're much
> > closer to the machine, and you have to plan further ahead (instead of
> > wa
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, G.W. Haywood wrote:
> If you can write Perl you can write C, there are onlya couple of dozen
> keywords. It's just that you're not so mollycoddled in C, you're much
> closer to the machine, and you have to plan further ahead (instead of
> waiting for the bang:). I prefer it
At 10:07 AM 10/30/00 +, Greg Cope wrote:
>Gunther Birznieks wrote:
>> This is an issue if your index.html requires the session id. So if you
>> direct to / you'll lose it. It's not bad if index.html is static, but it
>> could be generated via a handler or perhaps it's an index.cgi
>
>This shou
"G.W. Haywood" wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Greg Cope wrote:
>
> > In theory there is no reason why this should not be translateable to C,
> > it is quite small (in perl).
> > However:
> > a) I cannot do C (and translating this is beyond me as a learning
> > exercise at the mo)
Hi there,
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Greg Cope wrote:
> In theory there is no reason why this should not be translateable to C,
> it is quite small (in perl).
> However:
> a) I cannot do C (and translating this is beyond me as a learning
> exercise at the mo).
> b) Also waiting is a good idea till all
Gunther Birznieks wrote:
>
> At 01:31 AM 10/30/2000 +, Greg Cope wrote:
> >[...snip...]
> > >
> > > And don't forget about the use of DirectoryIndex:
> > > GET /index.html http/1.0
> > >
> > > HTTP/1.1 302 Found <<== here's your redirect
> > >
> > > Now this gets through:
> > > GET / http/1.
At 01:31 AM 10/30/2000 +, Greg Cope wrote:
>[...snip...]
> >
> > And don't forget about the use of DirectoryIndex:
> > GET /index.html http/1.0
> >
> > HTTP/1.1 302 Found <<== here's your redirect
> >
> > Now this gets through:
> > GET / http/1.0
>
>Hum ...
>
>Nice one - I had not tried this
Bill Moseley wrote:
>
> At 05:24 PM 10/29/00 +, Greg Cope wrote:
> >Announcing Apache::SessionManager.
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> Here's a couple of other comments.
I should have mentioned that this was my first bit of public code - and
to be gentle ..
>
> Don't forget to keep track of args on red
13 matches
Mail list logo
