Re: [OT] Off topic question a little worried

2002-03-22 Thread lembark
Assuming the content isn't updated too often, burning the site from a test area and mounting it as a CDROM makes it pretty hard for outsiders to udpate. -- Steven Lembark 2930 W. Palmer Workhorse Computing Chicago, IL 60647

Re: [OT] Off topic question a little worried

2002-03-21 Thread wsheldah
This link offers some general guidelines for recovering from a compromised server: http://www.cert.org/tech_tips/win-UNIX-system_compromise.html Hope it helps, and good luck. Wes Perrin Harkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/21/2002 03:42:55 PM To: John Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: [EMAIL

Re: [OT] Off Topic?

2001-10-15 Thread Ged Haywood
Hi guys, On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, Robin Berjon and Ed Phillips wrote: On Friday 12 October 2001 00:52, Ged Haywood wrote: See attached. RB Shouldn't that document go on perl.apache.org ? Last time you brought it up RB you thought that it wasn't perfect enough yet, but however relatively RB

[OT] Off Topic?

2001-10-11 Thread George Sanderson
Is there anything special about putting things, like, [OT] in the subject line, other than being informative? The reason I ask, is that I would like to send [OT] messages to the most appropriate list. Is there a reference that provides a list of lists for apache.org that can be used to direct

Re: [OT] Off Topic?

2001-10-11 Thread Perrin Harkins
Is there anything special about putting things, like, [OT] in the subject line, other than being informative? No, but it does allow people to use automatic mail filters to ignore OT messages. Is there a reference that provides a list of lists for apache.org that can be used to direct the

Re: [OT] Off Topic?

2001-10-11 Thread Ged Haywood
Swartz' implementation of Perl embedded in HTML. NEWS Items of news likely to be interesting to mod_perlers. OffTopic Or [OT] Off-topic items, please try to keep traffic low. PATCH Suggested fix for fault in mod_perl or associated software. QUESTION