On Monday, March 25, 2002, at 10:20 AM, Hans Juergen von Lengerke wrote:
> We are currently using squid set up as a reverse proxy to accelerate
> several heavy backends (mod_perl, etc) and to protect them from slow
> client connections.
>
> I am looking into replacing the squid with apache+mod_pro
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Hans Juergen von Lengerke wrote:
> We are currently using squid set up as a reverse proxy to accelerate
> several heavy backends (mod_perl, etc) and to protect them from slow
> client connections.
>
> I am looking into replacing the squid with apache+mod_proxy. Why?
> Becaus
Hi there,
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Hans Juergen von Lengerke wrote:
> I am looking into replacing the squid with apache+mod_proxy.
I don't know if it will do what you need, but you might want to have
a look at mod_accel. If this URI is broken mail dapimailru
for the information.
http://dapi.chaz.
[Cross-posting to multiple mailing lists is dangerous (and a little
annoying) because people responding will usually not be members of all the
lists, and will therefore have to deal with bounces.]
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Hans Juergen von Lengerke wrote:
>
> Now, I've tried to replace the squid with
- Original Message -
From: Hans Juergen von Lengerke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, March 25, 2002 4:20 pm
Subject: [OT] Replacing reverse squid with mod_proxy
> Now I'm left with two choices: give up or try harder :-)
>
> Before I decide for one of them I th
We are currently using squid set up as a reverse proxy to accelerate
several heavy backends (mod_perl, etc) and to protect them from slow
client connections.
I am looking into replacing the squid with apache+mod_proxy. Why?
Because ultimately I'd like to be able to cluster the frontend using
mod_
