Re: [PATCH] in memory $Application object for Apache::ASP

2000-03-29 Thread Joshua Chamas
Joel Reed wrote: > > modperl> yes this is the killer with making my stuff work for both iis/asp & modperl. > modperl> do you have any suggestions for an api consistent solution? maybe i could > modperl> hack up something where $Application data was obtainable thru IPC? the > modperl> killer is th

Re: [PATCH] in memory $Application object for Apache::ASP

2000-03-29 Thread Joel Reed
On Mar 29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] hacked the bitstream to say... modperl> Joshua> What you don't get here is interprocess communication modperl> Joshua> which is what the use of $Application is geared for, that modperl> Joshua> the data is stored is some process neutral location, so modperl> Joshua> we

Re: [PATCH] in memory $Application object for Apache::ASP

2000-03-29 Thread Joel Reed
On Mar 29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] hacked the bitstream to say... Joshua> Joel Reed wrote: Joshua> > Joshua> > this may be a dumb patch to Apache::ASP (at least it is my first). Joshua> > Joshua> > Rationale: Joshua> > Joshua> > i have the following issues with the current implementation of $Applicat

Re: [PATCH] in memory $Application object for Apache::ASP

2000-03-29 Thread Joshua Chamas
Joel Reed wrote: > > this may be a dumb patch to Apache::ASP (at least it is my first). > > Rationale: > > i have the following issues with the current implementation of $Application > > 1. everything you store in $Application->{foo} must be > serializable my MLDBM. (right?) i

[PATCH] in memory $Application object for Apache::ASP

2000-03-28 Thread Joel Reed
this may be a dumb patch to Apache::ASP (at least it is my first). Rationale: i have the following issues with the current implementation of $Application 1. everything you store in $Application->{foo} must be serializable my MLDBM. (right?) i have SWIG'd c++ classes for