RE: [is it time for something other than html?] RE: Templating s

2000-07-27 Thread jbodnar
I could go off about why HTML sucks for dynamic page caching. If there was somehow a way to cache say the template, leaving only the same dynamic portion uncached, it would certainly help things along quite a bit. If anyone knows of a good way of doing this I would certainly be interested in

RE: [is it time for something other than html?] RE: Templating s

2000-07-27 Thread Jauder Ho
No. The problem is that you cannot cache the subsequent page that is generated because of the dynamic component. The template is always going to remain the same (interface changes should be rare for a stable web site), but the content (say news headlines or personalized component) is going to be

RE: [is it time for something other than html?] RE: Templating s

2000-07-27 Thread jbodnar
On 27-Jul-2000 Jauder Ho wrote: No. The problem is that you cannot cache the subsequent page that is generated because of the dynamic component. The template is always going to remain the same (interface changes should be rare for a stable web site), but the content (say news headlines or

RE: [is it time for something other than html?] RE: Templating s

2000-07-27 Thread Paul J. Lucas
On Thu, 27 Jul 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: H2[+ $forum-title +]/H2 The problem with this is that it looks really ugly in Dreamweaver (for example). The HTML designer can't design a mock-up page with dummy content using that technique that can then be passed

Re: [is it time for something other than html?] RE: Templating s

2000-07-27 Thread jbodnar
On 27-Jul-2000 Jauder Ho wrote: The template may be kept in memory but it needs to be reparsed to insert real values, no? What I would like to see is a way to say the template is static (header/footer) and does not need to be reparse/regenerated each time and comparitively small portion

RE: [is it time for something other than html?] RE: Templating s

2000-07-27 Thread Gerald Richter
H2[+ $forum-title +]/H2 The problem with this is that it looks really ugly in Dreamweaver (for example). That's a matter of taste... And because it's a matter of taste (what is one of the results for me of this discussion, everybody likes his aproach most :-), I have designed