on 26.11.01 17:14, John Saylor at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
( 01.11.25 22:37 +0100 ) Thomas Klausner:
You can look at my idea of the the new modperl-site design here:
http://domm.zsi.at/modperl-site-domm/
Nice work!
Is it all right to talk details?
In my opinion something like:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 01:36:07AM +0100, Robin Berjon wrote:
* The first page (Home) successfully validates at w3.org (HTML and CSS).
That's very good. Do the others validate as well (or at least, do you see any
reason why they wouldn't ?) ?
On some of the deeper pages, Pod::POM
Hi
( 01.11.25 22:37 +0100 ) Thomas Klausner:
You can look at my idea of the the new modperl-site design here:
http://domm.zsi.at/modperl-site-domm/
I like it. The main part of it is now just an elaboration of the
contents, I imagine this will be a changing teaser of some sort.
* While the
Hi!
You can look at my idea of the the new modperl-site design here:
http://domm.zsi.at/modperl-site-domm/
You can get the whole distro to download at:
http://domm.zsi.at/modperl-site-domm/modperl-site-domm.src.tgz
or just the output at:
On Sunday 25 November 2001 22:37, Thomas Klausner wrote:
http://domm.zsi.at/modperl-site-domm/
Simple, nice, and cool (imho), thanks for submitting !
* The first page (Home) successfully validates at w3.org (HTML and CSS).
That's very good. Do the others validate as well (or at least, do you
Hi!
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 01:36:07AM +0100, Robin Berjon wrote:
* The first page (Home) successfully validates at w3.org (HTML and CSS).
That's very good. Do the others validate as well (or at least, do you see any
reason why they wouldn't ?) ?
On some of the deeper pages, Pod::POM
