On Yesterday at 11:17am, SB=Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SB Is it possible that you have an old install and it gets loaded
SB instead? Can you try nuking any preinstalled mod_perl libs?
SB
Hi Stas,
This will be a long email (I think you're probably used to looking at long
emails
Haroon Rafique wrote:
On Yesterday at 11:17am, SB=Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SB Is it possible that you have an old install and it gets loaded
SB instead? Can you try nuking any preinstalled mod_perl libs?
SB
Hi Stas,
This will be a long email (I think you're probably used to looking
On Today at 12:03pm, SB=Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SB
SB In the case of 1.99_09, following happens after running make test
SB
SB [Mon Jun 02 15:55:16 2003] [error] Invalid CODE attribute:
SB TestFilter::out_init_basic at
SB
Haroon Rafique wrote:
On Today at 12:03pm, SB=Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SB
SB In the case of 1.99_09, following happens after running make test
SB
SB [Mon Jun 02 15:55:16 2003] [error] Invalid CODE attribute:
SB TestFilter::out_init_basic at
SB
system details are posted as cut-and-paste from t/REPORT output at the end
of the email.
Background:
1. make test passes 100% with 1.99_08
2. make test fails to start the webservers with 1.99_09
3. make test fails to start the webservers with 1.99_10-dev (cvs)
In the case of 1.99_09, following
Haroon Rafique wrote:
system details are posted as cut-and-paste from t/REPORT output at the end
of the email.
Background:
1. make test passes 100% with 1.99_08
2. make test fails to start the webservers with 1.99_09
3. make test fails to start the webservers with 1.99_10-dev (cvs)
Right, the
