RE: Building mod-perl 2 for cygwin

2003-02-19 Thread Steve Baldwin
-thread-multi-64int /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl . -Original Message- From: Stas Bekman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 19 February 2003 10:07 AM To: Steve Baldwin Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Building mod-perl 2 for cygwin

Re: Building mod-perl 2 for cygwin: taint cleanup

2003-02-19 Thread Stas Bekman
[splitting the thread in two] Stas Bekman wrote: Steve Baldwin wrote: I've got Apache2 installed and as far as I can tell, it is functional. I'm trying to build mod-perl from source (as I couldn't find any binaries for cygwin). When I initially ran the command : perl Makefile.PL

Re: Building mod-perl 2 for cygwin

2003-02-19 Thread Stas Bekman
Steve Baldwin wrote: Unfortunately, I get the same (as far as I can see) result. Here's my latest perl -V ... You mean, you get a bunch of unresolved symbols, right? from your previous report: Now, make (of mod-perl) gives the following errors ... modperl_env.lo(.text+0x89e):modperl_env.c:

Re: Building mod-perl 2 for cygwin

2003-02-19 Thread Randy Kobes
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Stas Bekman wrote: Steve Baldwin wrote: Unfortunately, I get the same (as far as I can see) result. Here's my latest perl -V ... You mean, you get a bunch of unresolved symbols, right? from your previous report: Now, make (of mod-perl) gives the following

Re: Building mod-perl 2 for cygwin

2003-02-19 Thread Stas Bekman
I have cygwin (for the tools), but haven't looked into compiling Apache/mod_perl with it. From what I understand, cygwin provides a C library (a dll) to get a unix-style API; this is to be contrasted with MinGW, which produces programs that don't rely on 3rd party dlls. cygwin, as well as having

Re: Building mod-perl 2 for cygwin

2003-02-18 Thread Stas Bekman
]] Sent: Monday, 17 February 2003 8:58 PM To: Steve Baldwin Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Building mod-perl 2 for cygwin Steve Baldwin wrote: Thanks very much for your reply Stas. Pardon my ignorance, but are you saying I need to rebuild Perl with different options. Unfortunately

RE: Building mod-perl 2 for cygwin

2003-02-17 Thread Steve Baldwin
Baldwin; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Building mod-perl 2 for cygwin We can take two approaches, patch all the places in the code where perl context is set explicitly to use #ifdef MULTIPLICITY, rather than #ifdef USE_THREADS. Or we can refuse to build mod_perl if MULTIPLICITY is enabled

Re: Building mod-perl 2 for cygwin

2003-02-17 Thread Stas Bekman
of: % perl -V | grep usethreads -Original Message- From: Stas Bekman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 17 February 2003 4:03 PM Cc: Steve Baldwin; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Building mod-perl 2 for cygwin We can take two approaches, patch all the places in the code where

Re: Building mod-perl 2 for cygwin

2003-02-16 Thread Stas Bekman
Steve Baldwin wrote: I've got Apache2 installed and as far as I can tell, it is functional. I'm trying to build mod-perl from source (as I couldn't find any binaries for cygwin). When I initially ran the command : perl Makefile.PL MP_AP_PREFIX=/usr/local/apache2 I got errors telling me it

Re: Building mod-perl 2 for cygwin

2003-02-16 Thread Stas Bekman
We can take two approaches, patch all the places in the code where perl context is set explicitly to use #ifdef MULTIPLICITY, rather than #ifdef USE_THREADS. Or we can refuse to build mod_perl if MULTIPLICITY is enabled without the threads. Of course the first solution is more favorable for

Building mod-perl 2 for cygwin

2003-02-15 Thread Steve Baldwin
I've got Apache2 installed and as far as I can tell, it is functional. I'm trying to build mod-perl from source (as I couldn't find any binaries for cygwin). When I initially ran the command : perl Makefile.PL MP_AP_PREFIX=/usr/local/apache2 I got errors telling me it couldn't find