Re: CGI scripts & mod_perl

2000-11-20 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Gunther Birznieks wrote: > Most normal applications do not require every bit of speed eeked out > of them that may be possible with an Apache handler. In the mod_perl > guide, a reasonably fast machine (which most production mod_perl sites > run on) shows very little time diff

Re: CGI scripts & mod_perl

2000-11-20 Thread Vivek Khera
> "GB" == Gunther Birznieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: GB> Apache::Registry programs are basically compatible with Velocigen, GB> PerlEx, and SpeedyCGI acceleration. I think that's a huge GB> commercial and open source advantage for anyone writing web GB> programs for sale or open community

Re: CGI scripts & mod_perl

2000-11-19 Thread Gunther Birznieks
At 03:04 PM 11/19/2000 -0800, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > > "Didier" == Didier Godefroy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >Didier> on 11/19/00 4:55 PM, Ime Smits at [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered the following: > >> | How do we make sure regular CGI scripts are using mod_perl??? > >> | Is there a way t

Re: CGI scripts & mod_perl

2000-11-19 Thread Ruben I Safir
Find the time to READ the documentation Tonight would be a good nite. Ruben http://www.mrbrklyn.com > At the moment, I'm just trying to get mod_perl to work and have users' > scripts use it. I haven't had time to read docs on how to use it, only > enough to get it going. > Will it speed up

Re: CGI scripts & mod_perl

2000-11-19 Thread Ruben I Safir
> > When you're *really* good with mod_perl, you abandon Apache::Registry > and move up to writing handlers or using embedded templating systems > like EmbPerl, Mason, or Template Toolkit. Actually, if your using EMBPERL, why even BOTHER with the CGI interface at all. But I think that EMBPERL u

Re: CGI scripts & mod_perl

2000-11-19 Thread Didier Godefroy
on 11/19/00 6:04 PM, Randal L. Schwartz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered the following: > Didier> Can I assume that whenever mod_perl is enabled that all existing perl > Didier> scripts use it without any modification of any kind? > > Not at all. Apache::Registry is a good stop-gap, but you have to

Re: CGI scripts & mod_perl

2000-11-19 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
> "Didier" == Didier Godefroy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Didier> on 11/19/00 4:55 PM, Ime Smits at [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered the following: >> | How do we make sure regular CGI scripts are using mod_perl??? >> | Is there a way to find out? >> >> Check $ENV{MOD_PERL}, it should read somethin

Re: CGI scripts & mod_perl

2000-11-19 Thread Didier Godefroy
on 11/19/00 4:55 PM, Ime Smits at [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered the following: > | How do we make sure regular CGI scripts are using mod_perl??? > | Is there a way to find out? > > Check $ENV{MOD_PERL}, it should read something like "mod_perl/1.24". Can I assume that whenever mod_perl is enabled th

Re: CGI scripts & mod_perl

2000-11-19 Thread Ime Smits
| How do we make sure regular CGI scripts are using mod_perl??? | Is there a way to find out? Check $ENV{MOD_PERL}, it should read something like "mod_perl/1.24". Ime - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

CGI scripts & mod_perl

2000-11-18 Thread Didier Godefroy
Quick (and maybe stupid) question(s): How do we make sure regular CGI scripts are using mod_perl??? Is there a way to find out? Is there anything to modify to make them work with mod_perl?? -- Didier Godefroy mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ---