On Thu, 20 Jan 2000, Pierre-Yves BONNETAIN wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > you'll get a better idea of the problem running strace (or truss)
> > against the server. in any case, you should avoid any code that's
> > forking a process, since it's throwing performance out the window.
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> you'll get a better idea of the problem running strace (or truss)
> against the server. in any case, you should avoid any code that's
> forking a process, since it's throwing performance out the window.
Is there a 'nice way' (meaning, a patch or manual change I ca
Doug MacEachern wrote:
> [...] in any case, you should avoid any code that's forking a
> process, since it's throwing performance out the window.
Date::Manip is only doing a few forks on initialization, which should
be ok in most cases.
> On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Pierre-Yves BONNETAIN wrote:
>
> >
you'll get a better idea of the problem running strace (or truss) against
the server. in any case, you should avoid any code that's forking a
process, since it's throwing performance out the window.
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Pierre-Yves BONNETAIN wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I have recently upgraded on
Hello,
I have recently upgraded one of my systems to Apache 1.3.9, mod_perl 1.21 and
perl 5.005 (from a apache 1.3.6, mo_perl 1.19 and perl 5.004 basis).
In the previous setup, my mod_perl programs were running smoothly (modulo my
own bugs, of course). But now, I get this kind of message
