Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think it doesn't matter whether it's a script or a module.
So if startup.pl contains:
use CGI ;
use DBI ;
use My::Application ;
Then there's no gain?
Of course there is!
I'm
Any easy fixes to this? am I the first to find this? Am i missing
something obvious? Perhaps having my own ChildRequest counter and
dieing myself, but more randomly, is a better way?
If you're using mod_perl why not use the Apache::SizeLimit module instead of
the MaxChildRequests. AFAIK the
Justin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I think happens is the children die after their last request,
and apache does not kick off a new child straight away.. MinFree is
set to 2 .. as 12 becomes 11 becomes 10 becomes 9, my backend is
getting less and less powerful and more and more swamped.
On 23 Jun 2000, David Hodgkinson wrote:
Justin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I think happens is the children die after their last request,
and apache does not kick off a new child straight away.. MinFree is
set to 2 .. as 12 becomes 11 becomes 10 becomes 9, my backend is
getting
Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 23 Jun 2000, David Hodgkinson wrote:
Justin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I think happens is the children die after their last request,
and apache does not kick off a new child straight away.. MinFree is
set to 2 .. as 12 becomes 11
On 23 Jun 2000, David Hodgkinson wrote:
Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 23 Jun 2000, David Hodgkinson wrote:
Justin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I think happens is the children die after their last request,
and apache does not kick off a new child straight
Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think it doesn't matter whether it's a script or a module.
So if startup.pl contains:
use CGI ;
use DBI ;
use My::Application ;
Then there's no gain?
--
Dave Hodgkinson, http://www.hodgkinson.org
Editor-in-chief, The
"J" == Justin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
J and apache does not kick off a new child straight away.. MinFree is
J set to 2 .. as 12 becomes 11 becomes 10 becomes 9, my backend is
J getting less and less powerful and more and more swamped. When
Make your min-free servers higher, and set max-free
"DH" == David Hodgkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DH If you take a large script, throw it at Apache::Registry, then you'll
DH be compiling the script every time the a diaghter respawns.
No, it doesn't happen when the child process is "spawned" (what is
this, OS/2? We "fork" around here!)
The backend/frontend setup works well, but for the following problem
that I think is a risk for loaded sites:
I set MaxChildRequests to 500, to effectively clean house every
now and again, as is recommended.. I have about 12 backend
modperl servers, and that handles the load fine. (about 250
On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, Justin wrote:
Hi Justin,
I set MaxChildRequests to 500, to effectively clean house every
now and again, as is recommended.. I have about 12 backend
modperl servers, and that handles the load fine. (about 250 front
ends).
What is MaxClients set to? Also, do you have
On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, Justin wrote:
What I think happens is the children die after their last request,
and apache does not kick off a new child straight away.. MinFree is
set to 2
Does it help if you crank MinSpareServers higher?
Perhaps having my own ChildRequest counter and dieing myself,
12 matches
Mail list logo
