Brian McCauley wrote:
[...]
OK, your last post's examples were more to the point of wanting to destroy
objects at the end of the request, and hence here is a new summary:
- move the perl4 lib solution to the perl_reference.pod
- suggest turning a lexical variable declared with my() into a global
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> local is perl4-ism, nowadays it's used only for localizing special
> perl variables, like $|.
Using package variables and local() in to do the job of block-scoped
lexicals is a Perl4-ism.
On the other hand, when using global variables (in which I include
Perrin Harkins wrote:
To summarize:
- move the perl4 lib solution to the perl_reference.pod
- suggest replacing my() with our() to avoid the closure, however this change
requires that the variables will be initialized before used in most cases
(example of 'open our $foo' which doesn't need to b
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 21:24, Stas Bekman wrote:
> [...]
> >>In effect you use local() to undef the variable, instead of explicitly
> >>initializing it. Why not doing this explictly?
> >
> >
> > Firstly it's conceptually neater to use local. I want to think of the
> > variable as local rather tha
[...]
In effect you use local() to undef the variable, instead of explicitly
initializing it. Why not doing this explictly?
Firstly it's conceptually neater to use local. I want to think of the
variable as local rather than as a global variable that needs to be
explicitly reset.
local is perl4-i
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Brian McCauley wrote:
> [...]
> >>Nice, but:
> >>
> >> > +The easiest and the fastest way to solve the nested subroutines
> >> > +problem is to change C to C C for all variables for
> >> > +which you get the warning. The C subroutines are never
> >>...
>
Brian McCauley wrote:
[...]
Nice, but:
> +The easiest and the fastest way to solve the nested subroutines
> +problem is to change C to C C for all variables for
> +which you get the warning. The C subroutines are never
...
[...]
> + local our $counter = 0;
local our? That should be either local
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > In private mail Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >>oops, that should be the modperl list... at modperl-docs we discuss
> >>mostly site/docs techical issues and there are very few people on this
> >>list to get enou
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In private mail Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
oops, that should be the modperl list... at modperl-docs we discuss
mostly site/docs techical issues and there are very few people on this
list to get enough exposure for this kind of feedback request.
Patch for "T
In private mail Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> oops, that should be the modperl list... at modperl-docs we discuss
> mostly site/docs techical issues and there are very few people on this
> list to get enough exposure for this kind of feedback request.
Patch for "The First Mystery" sec
10 matches
Mail list logo
