Kee Hinckley wrote:
At 2:27 PM -0500 3/23/02, Geoffrey Young wrote:
you might be interested in Joshua Chamas' ongoing benchmark project:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">http://mathforum.org/epigone/modperl/sercrerdprou/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.chamas.com/bench/
he has the results from a
At 2:27 PM -0500 3/23/02, Geoffrey Young wrote:
you might be interested in Joshua Chamas' ongoing benchmark project:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">http://mathforum.org/epigone/modperl/sercrerdprou/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.chamas.com/bench/
he has the results from a benchmark of Apache::Registry and
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002, Kee Hinckley wrote:
At 2:27 PM -0500 3/23/02, Geoffrey Young wrote:
you might be interested in Joshua Chamas' ongoing benchmark project:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">http://mathforum.org/epigone/modperl/sercrerdprou/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.chamas.com/bench/
he has the results
Im curious as to the difference in performance when using perl scripts with
Apache::Registry or writing complete Apache Modules in Perl that conform to
the API?
-jve
John Von Essen wrote:
Im curious as to the difference in performance when using perl scripts with
Apache::Registry or writing complete Apache Modules in Perl that conform to
the API?
straight mod_perl handlers are faster than Apache::Registry, but they lack some
of the convenience that
Im curious as to the difference in performance when using perl scripts
with
Apache::Registry or writing complete Apache Modules in Perl that
conform to
the API?
Check the list archives for benchmarks by Joshua Chamas. Note that
there are other reasons to use handlers instead of Registry,
