the list of archives can be found on the main mod_perl page:
http://perl.apache.org/
i liks geocrawler's personally.
--
___cliff [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.genwax.com/Issam Alameh
wrote:
> hello,does perl 5.6 supports mod_perl and Apache::ASP module?? I
> don't know if somebody has answere
hello,
does perl 5.6
supports mod_perl and Apache::ASP module??
I don't know if somebody has answered
this question before, but I am new to this mailing list and I don't know from
where to get the archives,
so fogive me
Regards
Issam Alameh
On Fri, 31 Mar 2000, Jeff Stuart wrote:
> Well, as I mentioned to someone else, I've been off the list for a while.
> It would have been nice if it there were something similar to what the
> Apache and Perl sites do. IE current version is X.XX. That way, one can
> know at a glance what the curr
On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Jeff Stuart wrote:
> Has anyone tried to use mod_perl with perl 5.6 yet?
I use it for some stuff on my development box, it seems to work fine:
http://i.valueclick.com/perl-status?myconfig
The standard recommendation is to wait a few months though (except if
you have som
- Original Message -
From: "Doug MacEachern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> if you could follow the hints in the SUPPORT doc for getting a stacktrace,
> that would help a great deal.
Sure, I'll see what info I can get without tampering with current working
installations.
Rodney
On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Rodney Broom (OE) wrote:
> U guess. Lots of weird little errors that I can't quite resolve. I can get
> Apache installed, but if I build with mod_perl, I can't get cgi or indexing
> to work. They just spit out segment fault errors.
if you could follow the hints in the SUPPO
Jeff Stuart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Vivek Khera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2000 11:14 AM
To: Jeff Stuart
Cc: Modperl Mailing List
Subject: RE: Perl 5.6 and mod_perl
>>>>> "JS" == Jeff Stuart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
Hi Jeff,
On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Jeff Stuart wrote:
> Has anyone tried to use mod_perl with perl 5.6 yet? If so, how did it go?
> Oh, are we still at 1.21 for mod_perl? If so, when's the next release? I
> hear that there are some important memory leak fixes in there.
>
> --
> Jeff Stuart
> [EMA
> "JS" == Jeff Stuart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JS> H*LL! I didn't even know that there WAS a mod_perl 1.22. :( Umm,
JS> where was this announced? It would have been nice if it were
JS> announced ON the web site! No mention anywhere of what version is
JS> current that I could find.
It
lynx -dump http://localhost/perl-status :
Embedded Perl version 5.006 for Apache/1.3.12 (Unix) mod_perl/1.22 process 557,
running since Tue Mar 28 08:32:42 2000
No problems, smooth build / install. I've been using it for a couple of days
now, and had not a single problem -- all my handlers wor
Jeff,
These issues are very resent in the archives of the mailing list.
Did you look there?
Did you look on CPAN for the latest copy of mod_perl?
I have mod_perl 1.22 with Apache 1.3.12 and Perl 5.6 on Linux with kernel
2.0.35 with libs that are just as old. This includes a large number of
addi
ith it and see
what's up.
--
Jeff Stuart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Rodney Broom (OE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2000 1:47 AM
To: Modperl Mailing List
Subject: Re: Perl 5.6 and mod_perl
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Stuart" &l
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Stuart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Has anyone tried to use mod_perl with perl 5.6 yet?
Yes, all day.
> If so, how did it go?
U guess. Lots of weird little errors that I can't quite resolve. I can get
Apache installed, but if I build with mod_perl, I can't
Has anyone tried to use mod_perl with perl 5.6 yet? If so, how did it go?
Oh, are we still at 1.21 for mod_perl? If so, when's the next release? I
hear that there are some important memory leak fixes in there.
--
Jeff Stuart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
14 matches
Mail list logo
