Re: $r->args vs $r->content

2002-05-13 Thread Todd Finney
At 10:29 PM 5/13/02, Mike Melillo wrote: >It works, but if I use the method in the eagle book for POST requests >%params = $r->content; then nothing gets returned. I've even printed >%params to the apache errlog with DataDumper, and its empty. > >One of the fields is an image file that will be up

RE: $r->args vs $r->content

2002-05-13 Thread Mike Melillo
No, It specifies multipart/form-data because page 131 of the eagle says its used for file uploads. Mike -Original Message- From: Todd Finney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 11:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: $r->args vs $r->content At 10:29 PM 5

RE: $r->args vs $r->content

2002-05-13 Thread Todd Finney
y [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 11:16 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: $r->args vs $r->content > >At 10:29 PM 5/13/02, Mike Melillo wrote: > >It works, but if I use the method in the eagle book for POST > requests > >%params = $

Re: $r->args vs $r->content

2002-05-14 Thread Issac Goldstand
Quoting Mike Melillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi, > > One of the fields is an image file that will be uploaded so I need to > use POST requests. Is this a job for Apache::Request? The eagle book > doesn't cover it much because it was "experimental" at the time of > publishing. > There's a v

Re: $r->args vs $r->content

2002-05-14 Thread Richard Clarke
D]] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 4:39 AM To: Mike Melillo Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: $r->args vs $r->content Quoting Mike Melillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi, > > One of the fields is an image file that will be uploaded so I need to > use POST requests. Is this a job for