Re: $r-args vs $r-content

2002-05-15 Thread Richard Clarke
] Subject: Re: $r-args vs $r-content Quoting Mike Melillo [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, One of the fields is an image file that will be uploaded so I need to use POST requests. Is this a job for Apache::Request? The eagle book doesn't cover it much because it was experimental at the time of publishing

Re: $r-args vs $r-content

2002-05-14 Thread Issac Goldstand
Quoting Mike Melillo [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, One of the fields is an image file that will be uploaded so I need to use POST requests. Is this a job for Apache::Request? The eagle book doesn't cover it much because it was experimental at the time of publishing. There's a version 1.0

Re: $r-args vs $r-content

2002-05-13 Thread Todd Finney
At 10:29 PM 5/13/02, Mike Melillo wrote: It works, but if I use the method in the eagle book for POST requests %params = $r-content; then nothing gets returned. I've even printed %params to the apache errlog with DataDumper, and its empty. One of the fields is an image file that will be

RE: $r-args vs $r-content

2002-05-13 Thread Mike Melillo
No, It specifies multipart/form-data because page 131 of the eagle says its used for file uploads. Mike -Original Message- From: Todd Finney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 11:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: $r-args vs $r-content At 10:29 PM 5/13/02

RE: $r-args vs $r-content

2002-05-13 Thread Todd Finney
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: $r-args vs $r-content At 10:29 PM 5/13/02, Mike Melillo wrote: It works, but if I use the method in the eagle book for POST requests %params = $r-content; then nothing gets returned. I've even printed %params to the apache errlog with DataDumper, and its empty