RE: [new module] proposal Apache::DebugHeaders

2000-03-31 Thread Geoffrey Young
-Original Message- From: Graham Barr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 31, 2000 3:12 AM To: Geoffrey Young Cc: 'Ask Bjoern Hansen'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; 'Stas Bekman'; 'darren chamberlain'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: [new module] proposal Apache::DebugHeaders

Re: [new module] proposal Apache::DebugHeaders

2000-03-31 Thread Graham Barr
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 04:07:38PM -0500, Geoffrey Young wrote: Hey, I'm not trying to redo anyone's work or step on toes... I am sure your not, but on the other hand when two modules are so close in functionality it can help to merge them. There are several reasons why this can be benificial,

Re: [new module] proposal Apache::DebugHeaders

2000-03-30 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Geoffrey Young wrote: Hi all... I finished an alpha of DebugHeaders (now potentially called DebugInfo) - here's the description. I still think it would fit much better as patches to Apache::DumpHeaders. :) They are doing pretty much the same thing. - ask -- ask

RE: [new module] proposal Apache::DebugHeaders

2000-03-30 Thread Geoffrey Young
ter the first OK (like # PerlTransHandler # you really need help if you call this one more than once, # though... return DECLINED; } 1; __END__ -Original Message- From: Ask Bjoern Hansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2

Re: [new module] proposal Apache::DebugHeaders

2000-03-29 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Francesc Guasch wrote: A very easy way of create Makefile.PL and module files and directories is typing this: h2xs -X -n My::Object Please don't do that for mod_perl. You get autoloading that way, which means mod_perl can't load the methods at start time, which means

Re: [new module] proposal Apache::DebugHeaders

2000-03-29 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, Geoffrey Young wrote: ok, this isn't all that clever, but recently I got tired of writing loops of warnings to debug headers_in and headers_out over and over again... Then you should look at the Apache::DumpHeaders module. :) Major feature is that it can be configured

RE: [new module] proposal Apache::DebugHeaders

2000-03-29 Thread Geoffrey Young
To: Francesc Guasch Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: [new module] proposal Apache::DebugHeaders On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Francesc Guasch wrote: A very easy way of create Makefile.PL and module files and directories is typing this: h2xs -X -n My::Object Please don't do that for mod_perl. You

RE: [new module] proposal Apache::DebugHeaders

2000-03-29 Thread Geoffrey Young
-Original Message- From: Ask Bjoern Hansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 6:30 AM To: Geoffrey Young Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: [new module] proposal Apache::DebugHeaders On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, Geoffrey Young wrote: ok, this isn't all

RE: [new module] proposal Apache::DebugHeaders

2000-03-29 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Geoffrey Young wrote: actually, http://perl.apache.org/src/apache-modlist.html recommends h2xs -AX -n Apache::YourPackageName what's the -C option - it isn't in my perldoc h2xs? It was supposed to be -c, shoot the typist :) Not really relevant with -X, but I always

Re: [new module] proposal Apache::DebugHeaders

2000-03-28 Thread Stas Bekman
Hi, Geoff ok, this isn't all that clever, but recently I got tired of writing loops of warnings to debug headers_in and headers_out over and over again... all this one does is spit out headers_in in the init phase and headers_out in the cleanup phase. Not terribly extensible, but

Re: [new module] proposal Apache::DebugHeaders

2000-03-28 Thread Francesc Guasch
Stas Bekman wrote: Did you know that CPAN tolerates even the packages with no Makefile.PL? I don't try to disencourage you to write Makefile.PL (feel free to "steal" one from your favorite module), but if you really cannot build yours release it as it is. It still might save one of us days