RE: CGI::Delete for Apache::Request

2000-05-18 Thread Doug MacEachern
say, rfc's are good for something after all ;) ok, form_data() it is!

RE: CGI::Delete for Apache::Request

2000-05-17 Thread Gunther Birznieks
At 10:45 PM 5/16/00 -0700, Doug MacEachern wrote: well, form_fields() is descriptive and would fit nicely with the other Apache::Table methods (headers_in, etc)... something like that, i was thinking post_data, but that table also has query string data in it, which might from a get. phooey.

RE: CGI::Delete for Apache::Request

2000-05-17 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Wed, 17 May 2000, Gunther Birznieks wrote: At 10:45 PM 5/16/00 -0700, Doug MacEachern wrote: well, form_fields() is descriptive and would fit nicely with the other Apache::Table methods (headers_in, etc)... something like that, i was thinking post_data, but that table also has

RE: CGI::Delete for Apache::Request

2000-05-17 Thread brian moseley
On Wed, 17 May 2000, Doug MacEachern wrote: because query string data isn't part of a 'form' either :) client_data? actually a large part of the time it is. for instance, search engines - most, if not all, are implemented with forms, but because they are using get instead of post, their data

RE: CGI::Delete for Apache::Request

2000-05-16 Thread Doug MacEachern
+=item parms thanks. the reason i've been holding off though, was because i wanted to rename parms() to be something a little more different from param(). i've asked for suggestions a few times, got any? :) p.s. from cvs Changes: Apache::Table-unset can now be called with an array reference

RE: CGI::Delete for Apache::Request

2000-05-16 Thread Geoffrey Young
-Original Message- From: Doug MacEachern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2000 2:27 AM To: Geoffrey Young Cc: Michael Blakeley; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CGI::Delete for Apache::Request +=item parms thanks. the reason i've been holding off though

RE: CGI::Delete for Apache::Request

2000-05-16 Thread Doug MacEachern
well, form_fields() is descriptive and would fit nicely with the other Apache::Table methods (headers_in, etc)... something like that, i was thinking post_data, but that table also has query string data in it, which might from a get. phooey. will you keep parms() around for folks who

RE: CGI::Delete for Apache::Request

2000-05-15 Thread Geoffrey Young
-Original Message- From: Doug MacEachern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 12, 2000 2:02 PM To: Michael Blakeley Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CGI::Delete for Apache::Request On Sat, 6 May 2000, Michael Blakeley wrote: I've been migrating some code off

Re: CGI::Delete for Apache::Request

2000-05-12 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Sat, 6 May 2000, Michael Blakeley wrote: I've been migrating some code off of the ENV-dependent methods in CGI.pm, so I can turn of PerlSetupEnv. Anyway, I couldn't find an Apache::Request method that had the functionality of CGI::Delete. Since I use Delete extensively, I coded a