> On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 04:32, Frank Maas wrote:
> Come to think of it, I have never had problems with mod_proxy caching
> thing I didn't want cached. Quite the opposite -- I had to be very
> careful with Expires headers to get anything cached at all.
>
> I think you might be mis-diagnosing the p
On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 04:32, Frank Maas wrote:
> But the idea of setting the Expiry header back in time is appealing...
Come to think of it, I have never had problems with mod_proxy caching
thing I didn't want cached. Quite the opposite -- I had to be very
careful with Expires headers to get anyt
> On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 09:55, Frank Maas wrote:
>> What I found was that sometimes users got served 'cached' dynamic
>> pages. Although the server should not cache the page it looked like
>> this happened whenever two requests were received at (nearly) the
>> same time by the server.
>
> What happ
On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 09:55, Frank Maas wrote:
> What I found was that sometimes users got served 'cached' dynamic pages.
> Although the server should not cache the page it looked like this happened
> whenever two requests were received at (nearly) the same time by the server.
What happens if you
