Re: process priorities and performance

2002-08-21 Thread James G Smith
Jim Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Everything I've read as an SA (for Solaris at least - though I would expect the other *nices to be similar) was to never set a user space (non O/S) process to less than -15. Other than that, it's another of those YMMV, measure before and after, and if it helps

RE: process priorities and performance

2002-08-20 Thread Jim Helm
Sorry for the late reply - been away for a bit. Everything I've read as an SA (for Solaris at least - though I would expect the other *nices to be similar) was to never set a user space (non O/S) process to less than -15. Other than that, it's another of those YMMV, measure before and after,