Doug MacEachern wrote:
> i've benchmarked the two, it makes a HUGE difference under solaris, Perl's
> malloc kicks the sh*t out of solaris system malloc. Perl's malloc is not
> as much of a win under linux, i don't have the numbers handy though.
The only potential gotcha with perl's malloc is t
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> > configure Perl with -Dusemymalloc
>
> Wait, doesn't usemymalloc mean to use the system's native malloc? This
> from INSTALL:
>
> "To build without perl's malloc, you can use the Configure command
>
> sh Configure -Uusemymalloc"
yeah,
On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Ken Kosierowski wrote:
>
> > What is the best way to compile the new Perl 5.6.0 with Modperl 1.22?
>
> same way you compile 5.005 with mod_perl
>
> > Should I use the 5.005 compatible flags or start from scratch and recompile
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Ken Kosierowski wrote:
> What is the best way to compile the new Perl 5.6.0 with Modperl 1.22?
same way you compile 5.005 with mod_perl
> Should I use the 5.005 compatible flags or start from scratch and recompile
> the modules I use?
you don't need the 5.005 compat flags