Re: Modperl 1.22 and Perl 5.6.0

2000-03-31 Thread Alan Burlison
Doug MacEachern wrote: > i've benchmarked the two, it makes a HUGE difference under solaris, Perl's > malloc kicks the sh*t out of solaris system malloc. Perl's malloc is not > as much of a win under linux, i don't have the numbers handy though. The only potential gotcha with perl's malloc is t

Re: Modperl 1.22 and Perl 5.6.0

2000-03-30 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote: > > configure Perl with -Dusemymalloc > > Wait, doesn't usemymalloc mean to use the system's native malloc? This > from INSTALL: > > "To build without perl's malloc, you can use the Configure command > > sh Configure -Uusemymalloc" yeah,

Re: Modperl 1.22 and Perl 5.6.0

2000-03-29 Thread Jeffrey W. Baker
On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, Doug MacEachern wrote: > On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Ken Kosierowski wrote: > > > What is the best way to compile the new Perl 5.6.0 with Modperl 1.22? > > same way you compile 5.005 with mod_perl > > > Should I use the 5.005 compatible flags or start from scratch and recompile

Re: Modperl 1.22 and Perl 5.6.0

2000-03-28 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Ken Kosierowski wrote: > What is the best way to compile the new Perl 5.6.0 with Modperl 1.22? same way you compile 5.005 with mod_perl > Should I use the 5.005 compatible flags or start from scratch and recompile > the modules I use? you don't need the 5.005 compat flags