At 9:52 Uhr +0200 25.06.2002, Alessandro Forghieri wrote:
FastCGI has slightly better speed, but I have seen it hanging (and it does
not look like support for FastCGI is going to be huge in the futuer),
It took mod_perl ages (i.e. until mod_accel has come up) to get an as
decent proxying setup
md wrote:
I was just a bit worried about the amount of static
content. In the past I've had a lot more hardware to
work with and I never had to worry about it much.
Static content is easy; just don't serve it from mod_perl. The proxy
approach is good, and so is a separate image server
Perrin == Perrin Harkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Perrin Static content is easy; just don't serve it from mod_perl. The proxy
Perrin approach is good, and so is a separate image server (which you can
Perrin host on the same machine). I've found thttpd to be an amazingly
Perrin efficient
Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 8:38 AM
Subject: Re: when to mod_perl?
Perrin == Perrin Harkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Perrin Static content is easy; just don't serve it from mod_perl. The
proxy
Perrin approach is good, and so is a separate image
Peter == Peter Bi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Peter I have a question regarding to the cached files. Although the
Peter maximal period is set to be 24 hours in httpd.conf's proxy
Peter settings, many of the files, which were cached from the backend
Peter mod_perl dynamical program, are strangely
- Original Message -
From: Randal L. Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Peter Bi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Perrin Harkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]; md [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 10:18 AM
Subject: Re: when to mod_perl?
Peter
You don't mention what OS you're using, but with Linux, 256mb just running
httpd seems quite generous whether you're using mod_perl or not. From what I
know, mod_perl is going to give you more performance on any given box.
And now, I can't resist: When should you? Why, when you're in the mod of
Quoting md [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
I'm working on a dynamic site that I originally
thought I would do with mod_perl. Now after reviewing
the requirements and available hardware, I wonder if
mod_perl will be my best solution.
The machine will not be a huge box (though I wasn't
--- Cees Hek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would build your application using plain old CGI,
following the guidlines that
mod_perl provides for running CGI applications under
the Apache::Registry
module. If you properly analyse your application,
and build small tight CGI
scripts, then
md wrote:
Hello,
I'm working on a dynamic site that I originally
thought I would do with mod_perl. Now after reviewing
the requirements and available hardware, I wonder if
mod_perl will be my best solution.
The machine will not be a huge box (though I wasn't
provided much in the way of
--- Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In any case we are talking about registry scripts,
aren't we? In that
case it takes very little time to turn it on and off
and test what is
better. Unless you are talking about writing full
fledged mod_perl API
handlers, which is only when your
: when to mod_perl?
--- Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In any case we are talking about registry scripts,
aren't we? In that
case it takes very little time to turn it on and off
and test what is
better. Unless you are talking about writing full
fledged mod_perl API
handlers
Peter Bi wrote:
wait a second ...
don't forget using proxy: it saves you a lot of dynamical calls, especially
if you have also a database.
good point, Peter. And there are many others. It's the best if you can
take some time and read the guide before you start coding. It includes a
big
13 matches
Mail list logo
