Ken Williams wrote:
The only thing keeping RegistryNG from being the main version of Registry
(which it will be in the future) is that it hasn't been tested enough by people
like you. So go for it! It's probably going to be a much cleaner way to
proceed than mucking around in Registry.
I'd like have my registry scripts be cached by their filename after
resolving symbolic links, and I think subclassing RegistryNG is the
cleanest way to accomplish this.
Unfortunately, I cannot find any documentation on RegistryNG. Is it ready
for prime-time, or should I just hack Registry for
