Re: Update: Re: PerlSendHeader Off & socket persistence (was Re:question: usingApache for non-HTML messages)

2000-10-02 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, B. Burke wrote: > Why would the lack of a $r->send_http_header call cause socket persistence > to go away? I was under the impression that $r->send_http_header only affected > what was sent to the client, but appearantly it affects Apache's socket handling > as well. because

Re: Update: Re: PerlSendHeader Off & socket persistence (was Re:question: usingApache for non-HTML messages)

2000-10-02 Thread B. Burke
Why would the lack of a $r->send_http_header call cause socket persistence to go away? I was under the impression that $r->send_http_header only affected what was sent to the client, but appearantly it affects Apache's socket handling as well. When I don't use $r->send_http_header, my sockets ar

Re: Update: Re: PerlSendHeader Off & socket persistence (was Re:question: usingApache for non-HTML messages)

2000-09-29 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, B. Burke wrote: > Once I changed how I was printing the header from the script, the socket > persistence > worked with PerlSendHeader Off. So I guess I solved my problem although I don't > really > know why. because CGI.pm will trigger a call to $r->send_http_header, regar