>
> I might be wrong, but I thought Embperl should never be loaded in
> startup.pl,
> even in UNIX.
>
On Unix you should load it on startup when modperl is linked staticly into
Apache. You shouldn't do so when mod_perl is compiled as DSO
Gerald
-
> 1.) 'PerlModule' ( eg. srm.conf ) or 'use HTML::Embperl'
> startup.pl) both
> don't work! But if I leave it - no problem! Is this a special
> "Win32-behaviour"?
> I read some mails from the archives that I'm not the only one who has had
> that
> problem. But why do I need it when everything run
On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Rolf Ohnmacht wrote:
> Now mod_perl and EmbPerl work fine on my NT+Win95 - I'm
> daily impressed how fast it works!
> But there are many open questions:
>
> 1.) 'PerlModule' ( eg. srm.conf ) or 'use HTML::Embperl' ( startup.pl) both
> don't work! But if I leave it - no probl
I use it from linux without a problem.
I think the problem had to do with dynamic libraries.
It is probably in the faq.
cliff rayman
genwax.com
"Eric L. Brine" wrote:
> > 'use HTML::Embperl' ( startup.pl) both don't work!
> > Is this a special "Win32-behaviour"?
>
> I might be wrong, but I thou
> 'use HTML::Embperl' ( startup.pl) both don't work!
> Is this a special "Win32-behaviour"?
I might be wrong, but I thought Embperl should never be loaded in startup.pl,
even in UNIX.
ELB
--
Eric L. Brine | Chicken: The egg's way of making more eggs.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Do you always hit th
Now mod_perl and EmbPerl work fine on my NT+Win95 - I'm
daily impressed how fast it works!
But there are many open questions:
1.) 'PerlModule' ( eg. srm.conf ) or 'use HTML::Embperl' ( startup.pl) both
don't work! But if I leave it - no problem! Is this a special
"Win32-behaviour"?
I read some ma
