Thanks to Gerald Richter, Vivek Khera, and Ilya Obshadko for suggesting
the solution to the X-Forwarded-For problem I was having.
After a little bit of experimentation, it would appear that
mod_proxy_add_forward module needs to appear before mod_proxy (and
therefore be lower down Apache&#
Hello Ewan,
ïÿòíèöà, 4 ôåâðàëÿ 2000 ã., you wrote:
EE> Module Name: mod_proxy_add_forward.c
EE> Content handlers: none
EE> Configuration Phase Participation: none
EE> Request Phase Participation: Fixups
EE> Module Directives: none
EE> Looks good to me. My guess is that I'm missing something obv
age-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Ewan Edwards
> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2000 8:49 PM
> To: mod_perl_list
> Cc: Vivek Khera
> Subject: Re: X-Forwarded-For problem
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 02:33:30PM -0500, Vivek Khera wro
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 02:33:30PM -0500, Vivek Khera wrote:
>
> EE> Looking at the front-end server's /server-info, included in the list of
> EE> built in modules, I see:
>
> EE> Module Name: mod_proxy_add_forward.c
> EE> Content handlers: none
> EE> Configuration Phase Participation: none
> E
> "EE" == Ewan Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
EE> Looking at the front-end server's /server-info, included in the list of
EE> built in modules, I see:
EE> Module Name: mod_proxy_add_forward.c
EE> Content handlers: none
EE> Configuration Phase Participation: none
EE> Request Phase Parti
Hi all,
I'm in the process of implementing the Guide's recipe for creating a
light front-end server / mod_perl enabled back-end server in order to
solve a problem with too many database connections being open, but
that's not the problem I'm writing about.
My app doesn't use IPs for state or anyt
