Re: forbidden vs. cookie

2001-05-01 Thread Issac Goldstand
rom an AuthenHandler and therefore constitute a problem that's not based on the content of that specific URI... Anyway, hope this helps. Issac - Original Message - From: "will trillich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 9:31

Re: forbidden vs. cookie

2001-05-01 Thread Stephen Reppucci
Howdy Ken! I think there are two separate issues here -- there's an expiration time on the cookie, which is your app's instruction to the client as to how long the cookie should be kept. Then there's an expiration time of the ticket represented by that cookie data (to use the Ticket Auth exampl

Re: forbidden vs. cookie

2001-05-01 Thread Ken Y. Clark
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, will trillich wrote: > Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 18:17:11 -0500 > From: will trillich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: forbidden vs. cookie > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 03:46:17PM -0400, Ken Y. Clark wrote: > > Here is some

Re: forbidden vs. cookie

2001-04-30 Thread will trillich
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 07:54:24PM -0400, Robert Landrum wrote: > >On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 03:46:03PM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote: > >> > From: will trillich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >> > Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 3:31 PM > >> > To: [EMAIL PROTE

Re: forbidden vs. cookie

2001-04-30 Thread Robert Landrum
>On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 03:46:03PM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote: >> > From: will trillich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> > Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 3:31 PM >> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > Subject: forbidden vs. cookie >> [sn

Re: forbidden vs. cookie

2001-04-30 Thread will trillich
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 03:46:03PM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote: > > From: will trillich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 3:31 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: forbidden vs. cookie > [snip] > > # this don't work so ho

Re: forbidden vs. cookie

2001-04-30 Thread will trillich
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 03:46:17PM -0400, Ken Y. Clark wrote: > Here is some code I've used in the past in a mod_perl app to > set a cookie and do a redirect at the same time. I believe it > works for most browsers -- or at least this code has been > working for over a year and I haven't heard to

Re: forbidden vs. cookie

2001-04-30 Thread Tim Tompkins
r http://www.arttoday.com/ -- - Original Message - From: "will trillich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 12:31 PM Subject: forbidden vs. cookie > i could really use some dumbed-down tips on setting cookies > during a redirect

Re: forbidden vs. cookie

2001-04-30 Thread Ken Y. Clark
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, will trillich wrote: > Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 14:31:02 -0500 > From: will trillich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: forbidden vs. cookie > > i could really use some dumbed-down tips on setting cookies > during a redirect. boy

Re: forbidden vs. cookie

2001-04-30 Thread Robert Landrum
>i could really use some dumbed-down tips on setting cookies >during a redirect. boy, this is really getting to me. > >using apache 1.3.9 on debian 2.2/potato > >in trying to implement the concept of the Apache::Ticket*.pm >modules from the Apache Modules (eagle) book in chapter 6 >(on pages 304+)

RE: forbidden vs. cookie

2001-04-30 Thread Geoffrey Young
> -Original Message- > From: will trillich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 3:31 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: forbidden vs. cookie > [snip] > > # this don't work so not, neither: >

forbidden vs. cookie

2001-04-30 Thread will trillich
i could really use some dumbed-down tips on setting cookies during a redirect. boy, this is really getting to me. using apache 1.3.9 on debian 2.2/potato in trying to implement the concept of the Apache::Ticket*.pm modules from the Apache Modules (eagle) book in chapter 6 (on pages 304+) i'm run