On Sat, 30 Dec 2000, Chris Nokleberg wrote:
oooh, cool. I've added this to Apache::DB.xs:
int
stop_debugger()
nice, i'll add that for the next version.
It appears that setting PL_perldb to zero is all that's required to turn
off the debugger! I thought I might have to fiddle with the
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Chris Nokleberg wrote:
Following up on my post on this subject a couple of months ago, here is a
proof-of-concept drop-in replacement for Apache::Registry that eliminates
the "my() Scoped Variable in Nested Subroutine"
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Chris Nokleberg wrote:
Following up on my post on this subject a couple of months ago, here is a
proof-of-concept drop-in replacement for Apache::Registry that eliminates
the "my() Scoped Variable in Nested Subroutine" problem.
nice hack!
It requires PERL5OPT = "-d"
Due to forgetfulness I was recently bitten by the infamous "my() Scoped
Variable in Nested Subroutines" problem using Apache::Registry, and it got
me thinking about whether it is fixable.
From the diagnostics:
This problem can usually be solved by making the inner subroutine
anonymous, using
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2000 2:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: getting rid of nested sub lexical problem
Below is a processed version of the increment_counter example from the
guide that works
"Douglas" == Douglas Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Douglas That gives me a 'Variable "$counter" may be unavailable at ./tst2 line 17.'
Douglas warning. And its sort of obfuscated (to me, anyway). I'd probably do it this
Douglas way:
Douglas #!/usr/local/bin/perl -w
Douglas use strict;
Converting "sub foo" into "local *foo = sub" won't work when the function
is called before is declared, because the local only works for the rest
of the block, not the entire block. i.e. you can't do
foo();
local *foo = sub {
...
};
Plus, I think you usually need the trailing
