"headless" operation

2000-05-02 Thread Tobias Hoellrich
[EMAIL PROTECTED], for a future project I'm in the need to support two different ways how our web based service can be accessed: 1.) The traditional way: Handling user requests through a browser 2.) The "headless" way: Handling under-the-hood requests which basically perform the same service as i

Re: "headless" operation

2000-05-02 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Tue, 2 May 2000, Tobias Hoellrich wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED], > > for a future project I'm in the need to support two different ways how our > web based service can be accessed: > 1.) The traditional way: Handling user requests through a browser > 2.) The "headless" way: Handling under-the-ho

Re: "headless" operation

2000-05-02 Thread Tim Gardner
I am guessing that the "headless" version is what I do this when I am doing a shockwave piece which calls cgi scripts. I create an html version which provides a browser interface, albeit more boring, to the same basic code so that I can more easily test the cgi side. My strategy is to create

Re: "headless" operation

2000-05-02 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Tue, 2 May 2000, Tim Gardner wrote: > I am guessing that the "headless" version is what I do this when I am > doing a shockwave piece which calls cgi scripts. I create an html > version which provides a browser interface, albeit more boring, to > the same basic code so that I can more easi

Re: "headless" operation

2000-05-02 Thread Autarch
On Tue, 2 May 2000, Tobias Hoellrich wrote: > for a future project I'm in the need to support two different ways how our > web based service can be accessed: > 1.) The traditional way: Handling user requests through a browser > 2.) The "headless" way: Handling under-the-hood requests which basica

Re: "headless" operation

2000-05-02 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Tue, 2 May 2000, Autarch wrote: > On Tue, 2 May 2000, Tobias Hoellrich wrote: > > > for a future project I'm in the need to support two different ways how our > > web based service can be accessed: > > 1.) The traditional way: Handling user requests through a browser > > 2.) The "headless" wa

Re: "headless" operation

2000-05-02 Thread Gunther Birznieks
At 03:52 PM 5/2/00 -0400, Tim Gardner wrote: >I am guessing that the "headless" version is what I do this when I am >doing a shockwave piece which calls cgi scripts. I create an html version >which provides a browser interface, albeit more boring, to the same basic >code so that I can more ea