The idea to modify mod_proxy.c is probaly the most
convenient solution. Instead of configure backend
machine from the ProxyPass setting, you may specifically
assign it to the one in the cookie, which takes only a
few lines of code to change --- well, plus extra steps
to handle the cookie.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The idea to modify mod_proxy.c is probaly the most
convenient solution. Instead of configure backend
machine from the ProxyPass setting, you may specifically
assign it to the one in the cookie, which takes only a
few lines of code to change --- well, plus extra
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But you're not accounting for the possibility of server
failure on the backend. A proper load-balancer
(including the open source ones and
mod_backhand) would detect dead servers and handle the
failover to
another server.
This is true. Then one has to ping the
Title: lame load balancer, mod_proxy, and sticky sessions
Hello,
I'd like to know if it is possible to use mod_proxy as a sticky session manager. Basically, I'd like to put mod_proxy behind the load balancer and allow the proxy servers to talk to the mod_perl servers. Unfortunately, the load
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 08:44:39AM -0400, Calbazana, Al wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to know if it is possible to use mod_proxy as a sticky session
manager. Basically, I'd like to put mod_proxy behind the load balancer and
allow the proxy servers to talk to the mod_perl servers. Unfortunately,
Calbazana, Al wrote:
I'd like to know if it is possible to use mod_proxy as a sticky session
manager.
It's possible in the sense that you could write a sticky session manager
and glom it onto mod_proxy. It's certainly not there right now.
If you just want a free load-balancer, take a look
Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Perrin Harkins wrote:
Calbazana, Al wrote:
I'd like to know if it is possible to use mod_proxy as a sticky session
manager.
It's possible in the sense that you could write a sticky session manager
and glom it onto mod_proxy. It's certainly not
