On Sat, 6 May 2000, Greg Cope wrote:
> : > > But you will be not able to tune the two types of the threads to have
> : > > different Apache parameters (MaxRequests and others) so I'm not sure
> you
> : > > will get rid of the dual setup, unless these will be taken care of by
> : > > mod_perl.
> :
: > > But you will be not able to tune the two types of the threads to have
: > > different Apache parameters (MaxRequests and others) so I'm not sure
you
: > > will get rid of the dual setup, unless these will be taken care of by
: > > mod_perl.
: >
: >well, there is a PerlInterpMaxRequests param
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Stas Bekman wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Apr 2000, Doug MacEachern wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Greg Cope wrote:
> >
> > > Does this mean that we {will|may} be able to use the interpreter pool to
> > > set up X Perl interpreters (say 20 to service dynamic handlers) with Z
> >
On Tue, 25 Apr 2000, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Greg Cope wrote:
>
> > Does this mean that we {will|may} be able to use the interpreter pool to
> > set up X Perl interpreters (say 20 to service dynamic handlers) with Z
> > apache (say 60 to handle static + dynamic content -
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Greg Cope wrote:
> Does this mean that we {will|may} be able to use the interpreter pool to
> set up X Perl interpreters (say 20 to service dynamic handlers) with Z
> apache (say 60 to handle static + dynamic content - assuming the dynamic
> content is passed to the Perl in
- Original Message -
From: "Gerald Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Greg Cope" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 23 April 2000 13:46
Subject: RE: mod_perl-1.99_01-dev [ - possibly OT ]
> >
> > I though the new a
>
> I though the new apache model was a hybrid were there were preforked
> children that then used threads - have I missed the plot here ?
>
Yes, you can configure any combination. See Erics mails on the "RE: mod_perl
2.x/perl 5.6.x ?" for a list of possible combinations.
Gerald
- Original Message -
From: "Gerald Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Greg Cope" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 22 April 2000 13:36
Subject: RE: mod_perl-1.99_01-dev
> >
> > Does this mean that we {will|may} be abl
>
> Does this mean that we {will|may} be able to use the interpreter pool to
> set up X Perl interpreters (say 20 to service dynamic handlers) with Z
> apache (say 60 to handle static + dynamic content - assuming the dynamic
> content is passed to the Perl interpreters) children, and hence have
>
- Original Message -
From: "Doug MacEachern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 21 April 2000 06:51
Subject: mod_perl-1.99_01-dev
> eric and stas already let the cat out of the bag, but i was planning to
> give a summary of what's in
> I should have been more clear!
nah, i realized right after i turned off my laptop, it was like 3am, i was
dum.
> I meant backward compatibility to the mod_perl API. Will I be able to take
> a module that makes extensive use of Apache::* mod_perl core modules, and
> expect it to work?
yes, th
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> > One thing you failed to mention was backward compatibility - what is your
> > intention with regard to that?
>
> apache-2.0+ and Perl 5.6.0+ are required for mod_perl-2.0
>
> if you want backward compatibility with older Apache/Perls,
> just use m
> One thing you failed to mention was backward compatibility - what is your
> intention with regard to that?
apache-2.0+ and Perl 5.6.0+ are required for mod_perl-2.0
if you want backward compatibility with older Apache/Perls,
just use mod_perl-1.xx, which i expect to stick around for quite a wh
On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> eric and stas already let the cat out of the bag, but i was planning to
> give a summary of what's in progress for mod_perl-2.0 anyhow :)
> i've included a summary of the pieces i'm currently working on, there's a
> great deal left to do, but it's loo
eric and stas already let the cat out of the bag, but i was planning to
give a summary of what's in progress for mod_perl-2.0 anyhow :)
i've included a summary of the pieces i'm currently working on, there's a
great deal left to do, but it's looking good and moving along fast.
i'll be putting thes
15 matches
Mail list logo
