At 02:54 12/02/2001 +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote:
Stas told me to forward my mail to the list, since there was a large
discussion about it. Since I now see that this seems to have been a kind
of dispute and not an ommision I'll provide references to the standards
below.
- Forwarded message from
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 03:13:55AM +0100, Robin Berjon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think so. The browser would be right to treat reg; as an entity,
not reg.
But why? It's not HTML in the first place, so expecting from clients to
interpret it in one way or another is not sensible.
If it
At 03:26 12/02/2001 +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 03:13:55AM +0100, Robin Berjon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I don't think so. The browser would be right to treat reg; as an entity,
not reg.
But why? It's not HTML in the first place, so expecting from clients to
interpret it
On 14 Sep 2000, Joe Schaefer wrote:
2) Apache::Request is better than your performance numbers indicate.
The problem I have with your comparison with Apache::args vs Apache::Request vs CGI
is that your benchmark code isn't fair. You're comparing method calls against
hash-table lookups,
Doug MacEachern [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
my $args = $q-param; # hash ref
you mean parms() ? the Apache::Request::parms hash ref is tied, so
there are still method calls, but less than calling params(), which does
extra stuff to emulate CGI::params.
I just looked at
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 03:24:50PM -0400, Joe Schaefer wrote:
On linux, the ext2 filesystem is VERY efficient at buffering filesystem
writes (see http://www.tux.org/lkml/#s9-12). If the post data is small
( I don't know what the default size is, but the FILE buffer for the tmpfile
is
Roger Espel Llima [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 03:24:50PM -0400, Joe Schaefer wrote:
On linux, the ext2 filesystem is VERY efficient at buffering filesystem
writes (see http://www.tux.org/lkml/#s9-12). If the post data is small
( I don't know what the default size
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What if you wanted the functionality of the fase handlers before and after
the loading of the file..
Could this also be accomplished by proper use of configuration statements
in http.conf?
Right now I do not think so, so getting the child tied up for the time
of
On 14 Sep 2000, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Stas,
http://perl.apache.org/guide/scenario.html#Buffering_Feature
...
There is no buffering of data uploaded from the client browser to the proxy,
thus you cannot use this technique to prevent the heavy mod_perl server from
being tied up during
Stas,
I was looking over the latest version of the performance
section, and I have a few suggestions/comments regarding
http://perl.apache.org/guide/performance.html
1) Your description of keep-alive performance is confusing.
Every browser I've seen that implements keep-alives
will open at
10 matches
Mail list logo
