on 8/4/01 1:34 PM, brian moseley at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
also, has there been any thought given to locking cached
items? when i'm using a shared cache with multiprocess
apache, the opportunity exists for multiple requests to
access a single session simultaneously, which can lead to
At 05:44 PM 8/5/2001 -0400, Perrin Harkins wrote:
on 8/4/01 1:34 PM, brian moseley at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
also, has there been any thought given to locking cached
items? when i'm using a shared cache with multiprocess
apache, the opportunity exists for multiple requests to
access a
On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, DeWitt Clinton wrote:
Can you check the actual data contained within the
object? If I understand things right, there is a chance
that the data itself is indeed the same. However, the
instance containing the data (in your case, an instance
of Wombat::Core::Session) will
ps: i've modified my code to 1) only get once per request
and 2) set at the end of each request. the net effect is
that stuff works as expected. i'm reasonably happy with the
current state of affairs, but...
i don't like having to explicitly call set to force
modifications to be written to the
On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 09:17:21AM -0700, brian moseley wrote:
could this be because i'm only ever doing one set, at
session creation time? since i'm using a memory cache, i
didn't expect to have to call set every time i modify the
cached data.
Yup. That would be it. Please see my
On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 10:34:34AM -0700, brian moseley wrote:
ps: i've modified my code to 1) only get once per request
and 2) set at the end of each request. the net effect is
that stuff works as expected. i'm reasonably happy with the
current state of affairs, but...
Excellent, this is
On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 03:06:37PM -0400, DeWitt Clinton wrote:
To quote Jimi Williams, manager's decision.
Yes, I know it is Jimy Williams. See what happens when a lifelong Red
Sox fan relocates down to NYC? We start losing our minds... :)
-DeWitt
On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, DeWitt Clinton wrote:
Excellent, this is the right approach. Sounds like I
need to update the documentation to say that objects
retrieved from the cache are not 'live,' they are
clones. If you want to save modifications, remember to
store them again in the cache.
