Re: stacked handlers return vals

2001-10-22 Thread Nikolaus Rath
* Geoffrey Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If I'm using stacked handlers, what should I return if I dont want the next handler in line to run because I've returned all required content to the client? (the eagle book says anything other than OK, DECLINED or DONE, but what's the

Re: stacked handlers return vals

2001-10-22 Thread Nikolaus Rath
* Mark Maunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nikolaus Rath wrote: * Mark Maunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, If I'm using stacked handlers, what should I return if I dont want the next handler in line to run because I've returned all required content to the client? (the eagle book says

RE: stacked handlers return vals

2001-10-22 Thread Geoffrey Young
what is wrong with DONE? DONE immediatly closes the client connection and starts the logging phase. if you have sent the content already then there is nothing to worry about. the call to send_http_header will pick up on the any status you set previously or use the default HTTP_OK

Re: stacked handlers return vals

2001-10-22 Thread Mark Maunder
Geoffrey Young wrote: what is wrong with DONE? DONE immediatly closes the client connection and starts the logging phase. if you have sent the content already then there is nothing to worry about. the call to send_http_header will pick up on the any status you set previously or

Re: stacked handlers return vals

2001-10-21 Thread Mark Maunder
Nikolaus Rath wrote: * Mark Maunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, If I'm using stacked handlers, what should I return if I dont want the next handler in line to run because I've returned all required content to the client? (the eagle book says anything other than OK, DECLINED or

RE: stacked handlers return vals

2001-10-21 Thread Geoffrey Young
-Original Message- From: Mark Maunder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2001 1:49 PM To: Nikolaus Rath Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: stacked handlers return vals Nikolaus Rath wrote: * Mark Maunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, If I'm using

Re: stacked handlers return vals

2001-10-21 Thread Mark Maunder
Geoffrey Young wrote: -Original Message- From: Mark Maunder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2001 1:49 PM To: Nikolaus Rath Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: stacked handlers return vals Nikolaus Rath wrote: * Mark Maunder [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: stacked handlers return vals

2001-10-20 Thread Nikolaus Rath
* Mark Maunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, If I'm using stacked handlers, what should I return if I dont want the next handler in line to run because I've returned all required content to the client? (the eagle book says anything other than OK, DECLINED or DONE, but what's the appropriate

stacked handlers return vals

2001-10-19 Thread Mark Maunder
Hi, If I'm using stacked handlers, what should I return if I dont want the next handler in line to run because I've returned all required content to the client? (the eagle book says anything other than OK, DECLINED or DONE, but what's the appropriate return val that wont cause the client to