Re: startup for Apache 2.0/mod_perl 1.99

2002-04-24 Thread Per Einar Ellefsen
At 19:31 24.04.2002, Chuck Goehring wrote: >That made it work! Your my hero!. That also made the script that accesses >Oracle work as well. We've staved off the IIS beast for another day! Great! >I'm not familiar with the testing stuff except when Doug had me run the >t/report thing.. I'm a

Re: startup for Apache 2.0/mod_perl 1.99

2002-04-24 Thread Chuck Goehring
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 8:53 PM Subject: Re: startup for Apache 2.0/mod_perl 1.99 > Chuck Goehring wrote: > > You're right. I'm getting impatient and jumping ahead. Pasted directly > > from your post, restarted Apache and get same thin

Re: startup for Apache 2.0/mod_perl 1.99

2002-04-24 Thread Per Einar Ellefsen
At 05:55 24.04.2002, Stas Bekman wrote: >Chuck Goehring wrote: >>Stas/Everyone, >>To follow up. With the starting and stopping of Apache and looking at the >>log, I see entries like "Child 1032: Waiting for 250 worker threads to >>exit." I was gettiong "Low virtual memory" errors from Win/2000,

Re: startup for Apache 2.0/mod_perl 1.99

2002-04-23 Thread Stas Bekman
Chuck Goehring wrote: > Stas/Everyone, > > To follow up. With the starting and stopping of Apache and looking at the > log, I see entries like "Child 1032: Waiting for 250 worker threads to > exit." I was gettiong "Low virtual memory" errors from Win/2000, so I added > ThreadsPerChild 24 to the

Re: startup for Apache 2.0/mod_perl 1.99

2002-04-23 Thread Stas Bekman
Chuck Goehring wrote: > You're right. I'm getting impatient and jumping ahead. Pasted directly > from your post, restarted Apache and get same thing > > [Tue Apr 23 12:16:54 2002] [notice] Parent: Created child process 2560 > [Tue Apr 23 12:16:58 2002] [notice] Child 2560: Child process is runn

Re: startup for Apache 2.0/mod_perl 1.99

2002-04-23 Thread Chuck Goehring
kman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Chuck Goehring" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 11:12 AM Subject: Re: startup for Apache 2.0/mod_perl 1.99 > Chuck Goehring wrote: > > Stas, > > First, there was no mod_perl 1

Re: startup for Apache 2.0/mod_perl 1.99

2002-04-23 Thread Chuck Goehring
re Apache; } Do I need to define 'GATEWAY_INTERFACE', or is it provided automatically by mod_perl? This is on Win2000. Thanks Chuck - Original Message - From: "Stas Bekman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Chuck Goehring" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[

Re: startup for Apache 2.0/mod_perl 1.99

2002-04-23 Thread Stas Bekman
Chuck Goehring wrote: > Stas, > First, there was no mod_perl 1.2x installed on this machine. I didn't think > I would need it, but I'm guessing. > > This was as you say. The didn't aggree with the registry > loaded in startup. That fixed that problem but now it complains about > CGI.pm as fol

Re: startup for Apache 2.0/mod_perl 1.99

2002-04-23 Thread Chuck Goehring
t;end_html; Thanks for any input. Chuck - Original Message - From: "Stas Bekman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Chuck Goehring" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 7:26 PM Subject: Re: startup for Apache 2.0/mod_p

Re: startup for Apache 2.0/mod_perl 1.99

2002-04-22 Thread Stas Bekman
Chuck Goehring wrote: > To all, > > > > Having trouble configuring Apache 2.0 with mod_perl. Don't know if I > need compat or not. > > > > My Apache 1.x/mod_perl 1.24 startup starts like this: > > > > use strict; > use Apache (); > use Apache::Registry; > use Apache::DBI(); > use CG

startup for Apache 2.0/mod_perl 1.99

2002-04-22 Thread Chuck Goehring
To all,   Having trouble configuring Apache 2.0 with mod_perl.  Don't know if I need compat or not.    My Apache 1.x/mod_perl 1.24 startup starts like this:   use strict;use Apache ();use Apache::Registry;use Apache::DBI();use CGI qw(-compile :cgi);use Carp();   That didn't fly on Apache 2.0