On 6/13/02 5:58 PM, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Also note perl.com is now running an article on threads::shared.
http://www.perl.com/pub/a/2002/06/11/threads.html
It's mainly aimed at module authors, but it could be of interest anyway.
Does anyone know the logic behind making the threads modules
On Thursday 13 June 2002 11:37 pm, John Siracusa wrote:
On 6/13/02 5:58 PM, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Also note perl.com is now running an article on threads::shared.
http://www.perl.com/pub/a/2002/06/11/threads.html
It's mainly aimed at module authors, but it could be of interest anyway.
On 6/13/02 6:40 PM, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Does anyone know the logic behind making the threads modules all lowercase?
I'd expect it to be Threads::Shared, not threads::shared.
Pragmas are lowercase. And use threads; is really a pragma.
A pragma with class methods? A pragma that exports
On Thursday 13 June 2002 11:50 pm, John Siracusa wrote:
On 6/13/02 6:40 PM, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Does anyone know the logic behind making the threads modules all
lowercase? I'd expect it to be Threads::Shared, not threads::shared.
Pragmas are lowercase. And use threads; is really a
We are really having fun here of courseand personally I'm more interested
in
the features than the writing Thread or thread...but perhaps one place
to draw the
line would be
If a directive or hint changes the behavior of the compiler or interpreter
in a
non-reversable fashion then it deserve