Re: mod_perl with a perl built with -Dusethreads, will it work?

2002-07-24 Thread WC -Sx- Jones
On Tuesday 23 July 2002 12:09 pm, regarding mod_perl with a perl built with -Dusethreads, will it work?, Brian wrote: Brian I would like to install Sendmail::Milter which needs a perl built Brian with thread support. Last time I tried to use a perl built with Brian thread support (5.6.x),

Re: Static vs. DSO on Linux specifically

2002-07-24 Thread WC -Sx- Jones
Sam Tregar No, the last Redhat Apache/mod_perl I used was in 6.2. I didn't file a Sam Tregar bug about it because after looking around it appeared that it was a well Sam Tregar known problem. After that I started compiling Apache/mod_perl static and Sam Tregar left the seg-faults behind.

Re: Static vs. DSO on Linux specifically

2002-07-24 Thread WC -Sx- Jones
-Sx- said Building as STATIC caused Apache to be rebuilt using the now current uselargefiles setting. Sam Tregar said I don't think so. Rebuilding Apache/mod_perl static with the exact same Perl that shipped with Redhat 6.2 solved the segfaults. :) How is this different from what I said?

Re: How to limit the size of requests ?

2002-08-30 Thread WC -Sx- Jones
[follow-ups set] PMFJI: Buffer overflow in this case happened because of sub-requests - which are hard to deal with at any rate. The actual GET/POST had nothing to do with the insecure action as far as this issue is concerned, the side effect was caused by the way the sub-request handled

Re: User process ownership

2002-09-04 Thread WC -Sx- Jones
In-Reply-To: 015501c25393$c8bd6af0$[EMAIL PROTECTED] With your current understanding of Perl/Apache - you cannot do this; however EXPECT (written by Don Libes at expect.nist.gov) can do it -- if you are willing to get a better grip on security issues. Once you see how the expect language works

Re: Seg Fault with PHP and Perl together

2002-09-04 Thread WC -Sx- Jones
# mod_perl - perl Makefile.PL \ USE_APXS=1 \ WITH_APXS=/usr/local/apache/bin/apxs \ EVERYTHING=1 \ USE_DSO=1 # PHP - ./configure --with-apxs=/usr/local/apache/bin/apxs \   --enable-force-cgi-redirect \   --enable-discard-path \   --with-pear \   --enable-safe-mode \   --with-openssl \  

Apache::Status for 2.0 ?

2003-06-03 Thread WC -Sx- Jones
Please bear with me -- I have recently picked up Apache2 and now trying out mod_perl2 I see Apache::Status listed under the mod_perl2 docs - http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/api/Apache/Status.html But I only see mod_perl 1.27 on the CPAN site; Is there another place to obtain a mod_perl2 type

Re: Apache::Status for 2.0 ?

2003-06-03 Thread WC -Sx- Jones
On Monday, June 2, 2003, at 08:29 PM, Stas Bekman wrote: WC -Sx- Jones wrote: I see Apache::Status listed under the mod_perl2 docs - http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/api/Apache/Status.html mod_perl-1.99_09 is not indexed by PAUSE, hence you can't see it. (because of _09). If you have

Re: Apache::Status for 2.0 ?

2003-06-03 Thread WC -Sx- Jones
On Monday, June 2, 2003, at 09:19 PM, Stas Bekman wrote: Have you looked? http://perl.apache.org/dist/mod_perl-2.0-current/lib/Apache/Status.pm Yes, of course. :) My question: Was it not installed when I built mod_perl2 ? So, on my server I looked for Apache -- [ results edited to remove

Re: Apache::Status for 2.0 ?

2003-06-03 Thread WC -Sx- Jones
On Monday, June 2, 2003, at 09:19 PM, Stas Bekman wrote: http://perl.apache.org/download/index.html Shouldn't there be a warning about mod_perl2 and CPAN then? CPAN definitely wants to download and install mod_perl1 -- even over a valid mod_perl2 installation... Regarding the following off

Re: Apache::Status for 2.0 ?

2003-06-03 Thread WC -Sx- Jones
Ignore me - On Monday, June 2, 2003, at 09:37 PM, WC -Sx- Jones wrote: Yes, of course. :) My question: Was it not installed when I built mod_perl2 ? I found (something) at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/sun4-solaris-thread-multi-64int/ Apache/Status.pm Now all I have to do