RE: [OT] (apache question) Working around MaxClients?

2001-02-23 Thread Stathy Touloumis
You could defined a different port in your img tags. Then you can start thttpd to bind to that port. You shouldn't have a problem binding to ports higher that 1024(?) I think. Unless they have done something to prevent this which is doubtful. Example: img

(apache question) Working around MaxClients?

2001-02-22 Thread Philip Mak
Hello, I have a high traffic website (looks like 200 GB output per month, something around 10-20 hits per day) hosted on a commercial service. The service does not limit my bandwidth usage, but they limit the number of concurrent Apache process that I can have to 41. This causes the

[OT] RE: (apache question) Working around MaxClients?

2001-02-22 Thread Stathy Touloumis
Why don't you setup apache to do proxying? I have a high traffic website (looks like 200 GB output per month, something around 10-20 hits per day) hosted on a commercial service. The service does not limit my bandwidth usage, but they limit the number of concurrent Apache process

Re: [OT] RE: (apache question) Working around MaxClients?

2001-02-22 Thread Philip Mak
# Doesn't work. Children still get tied up serving requests. #ProxyPass / http://www.animewallpapers.com:8080/ #ProxyPassReverse / http://www.animewallpapers.com:8080/ That doesn't get me around the limit of 41 Apache processes... -Philip Mak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Stathy

Re: [OT] (apache question) Working around MaxClients?

2001-02-22 Thread Perrin Harkins
I have a high traffic website (looks like 200 GB output per month, something around 10-20 hits per day) hosted on a commercial service. The service does not limit my bandwidth usage, but they limit the number of concurrent Apache process that I can have to 41. This causes the server