-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 01:17:45AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
I'm willing to bet that this is the Known Nasty having to do with how
Apache re-reloads modules.
Looks that way to me, but I get lost in exactly when/how mod_perl gets called.
Are you using PerlFreshRestart?
Same behavior, on or off.
That's strange. With PerlFreshRestart on, it is supposed to clear things
out when restarting, which seems consistent with what you're seeing. Are
you sure there is no difference in that trace at all when you turn it on or
off?
Eureka. Took quite a bit of debugging, but I finally tracked it down.
First, the setup...our module structure goes something like this:
IQGroup
\_ Core
|_ IQCoordinator
|_ IQDeveloper
|_ IQNextNeatApplication
The IQGroup class is our master mod_perl handler -- it handles 99% of the
With the PerlModule/%INC problem recently being rehashed, here's another one
involving PerlModule vs. use that will really bake your noodle.
Attached is a full mod_perl trace, where I hacked into perl_require_module a
dump of one of my vanishing namespaces on each module load. So you can
IMHO, this looks similar to (though more catastrophic than) the problem I have been
dealing with for some time now.
From the archive :
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/modperl/message/38622
There is a long thread about it. It is presently unresolved. (We're hoping for
Divine intervention.
All is well until you reach the end,
where it starts reloading everything, and the namespace is
now completely gone.
Are you using PerlFreshRestart?
I posted this once before and got blown off -- a pox
on to those who tell me to check @INC or what not.
No need to get testy. If this is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 11:08:07PM -0500, Perrin Harkins wrote:
Are you using PerlFreshRestart?
Same behavior, on or off.
No need to get testy.
That came out wrong, apparently. Sorry.
You should be able to replace a PerlModule call with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 05:33:12PM -0800, David Pisoni wrote:
IMHO, this looks similar to (though more catastrophic than) the problem I
have been dealing with for some time now.
From the archive :
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 04:15:49PM -0600, Stephen Clouse wrote:
With the PerlModule/%INC problem recently being rehashed, here's another one
involving PerlModule vs. use that will really bake your noodle.
Attached is a full mod_perl trace, where I hacked into perl_require_module a
dump of
