Re: Perl as DSO...whats wrong with it, specifically?

2000-07-28 Thread Dan Campbell
The one trick that finally enabled me to get mod_perl to work as a DSO with IBM's WebSphere on AIX was a utility named rtl_enable. There were a few changes I had to make to one of mod_perl's makefiles (apaci/Makefile, I think) to get libperl.so to build, but even then httpd would segfault as

Re: Perl as DSO...whats wrong with it, specifically?

2000-07-26 Thread Jens-Uwe Mager
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 07:37:47PM -0500, John Marquart wrote: Using the following config. line: perl Makefile.PL EVERYTHING=1 USE_APACI=1 APACI_ARGS='--enable-shared=perl' Everything builds up to this point ... === src/modules/standard Target "all" is up to date. ===

RE: Perl as DSO...whats wrong with it, specifically?

2000-07-25 Thread jbodnar
I run mod_perl as a DSO without a problem. Just don't try to mix it with php as a DSO. On 25-Jul-2000 Michael Nachbaur wrote: I'm working with IBM (sorry! Its not my choice!) to try to get mod_perl compiled into their custom version of Apache, and their techs want to know why I can't run

Re: Perl as DSO...whats wrong with it, specifically?

2000-07-25 Thread Vivek Khera
"MN" == Michael Nachbaur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: MN I'm working with IBM (sorry! Its not my choice!) to try to get MN mod_perl compiled into their custom version of Apache, and their MN techs want to know why I can't run mod_perl as a DSO. So, I need MN to know, whats specifically wrong

RE: Perl as DSO...whats wrong with it, specifically?

2000-07-25 Thread Michael Nachbaur
Maillist Subject: Re: Perl as DSO...whats wrong with it, specifically? "MN" == Michael Nachbaur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: MN I'm working with IBM (sorry! Its not my choice!) to try to get MN mod_perl compiled into their custom version of Apache, and their MN techs want to know why I

Re: Perl as DSO...whats wrong with it, specifically?

2000-07-25 Thread Jens-Uwe Mager
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 01:14:32PM -0700, Michael Nachbaur wrote: I'm working with IBM (sorry! Its not my choice!) to try to get mod_perl compiled into their custom version of Apache, and their techs want to know why I can't run mod_perl as a DSO. So, I need to know, whats specifically

RE: Perl as DSO...whats wrong with it, specifically?

2000-07-25 Thread Vivek Khera
"MN" == Michael Nachbaur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: MN So, if it depends on such variables as what its compiled with and MN what platform you're running on, then may I infer that it is MN somewhat flaky on unknown platforms? I'm going to be running this I recall seeing some AIX specific

Re: Perl as DSO...whats wrong with it, specifically?

2000-07-25 Thread blue
On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, Michael Nachbaur wrote: I'm working with IBM (sorry! Its not my choice!) to try to get mod_perl compiled into their custom version of Apache, and their techs want to know why I can't run mod_perl as a DSO. So, I need to know, whats specifically wrong with it? Like,

Re: Perl as DSO...whats wrong with it, specifically?

2000-07-25 Thread Jens-Uwe Mager
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 04:33:12PM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote: I recall seeing some AIX specific workarounds to some things within mod_perl. I don't recall if those were DSO specific. I know for sure that on BSD/OS with perl 5.004_04 it is stable as a DSO using the latest mod_perl and apache

Re: Perl as DSO...whats wrong with it, specifically?

2000-07-25 Thread clayton cottingham aka drfrog
ive personally not had any probs with mod_perl as a dso blue wrote: On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, Michael Nachbaur wrote: I'm working with IBM (sorry! Its not my choice!) to try to get mod_perl compiled into their custom version of Apache, and their techs want to know why I can't run

Re: Perl as DSO...whats wrong with it, specifically?

2000-07-25 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 01:14:32PM -0700, Michael Nachbaur wrote: I'm working with IBM (sorry! Its not my choice!) to try to get mod_perl compiled into their custom version of Apache, and their techs want to know why I can't run mod_perl as a DSO. So, I need to know, whats specifically

Re: Perl as DSO...whats wrong with it, specifically?

2000-07-25 Thread Jens-Uwe Mager
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 04:04:12PM -0500, John Marquart wrote: In general - all of the previous threads on this topic have either gone off-list or were never resolved. Sorry, I dropped your last post onto the floor somehow. I will answer in a seperate post about these. I spent several weeks

Re: Perl as DSO...whats wrong with it, specifically?

2000-07-25 Thread Jens-Uwe Mager
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 11:57:56PM +0200, Jens-Uwe Mager wrote: From the last post from you I have you appeared to use mod_perl-1.22. What exactly have you been using? Oops - I did misread, you said you are using 1.24. -- Jens-Uwe Mager HELIOS Software GmbH Steinriede 3 30827 Garbsen

Re: Perl as DSO...whats wrong with it, specifically?

2000-07-25 Thread John Marquart
On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, Jens-Uwe Mager wrote: On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 04:04:12PM -0500, John Marquart wrote: In general - all of the previous threads on this topic have either gone off-list or were never resolved. Sorry, I dropped your last post onto the floor somehow. I will answer in a

Perl as DSO...whats wrong with it, specifically?

2000-07-25 Thread Michael Nachbaur
I'm working with IBM (sorry! Its not my choice!) to try to get mod_perl compiled into their custom version of Apache, and their techs want to know why I can't run mod_perl as a DSO. So, I need to know, whats specifically wrong with it? Like, what are the repurcussions of it? This is going