I think you should consider using a system that is actually
supported.
Embperl, Apache::ASP, Text::Template, and Mason all have
similar syntax
to ePerl. There are lots of other things on CPAN that might be even
closer in syntax, but are not as widely used and well supported.
I just
On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 02:51, wrote:
I have done code deparsing of eperl scripts saved in Cache
all started with
package Parse::ePerl;
use strict 'refs';
print(qq[?xml version=1.0?\n]);
so they all have the same package name. Can it cause a bug?
On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 02:41, wrote:
I'm using only Apache::ePerl which allows me use Perl in the the way
like
PHP, since I don't need Mason or EmbPerl html features for small WAP
resources.
I think you should consider using a system that is actually supported.
Embperl, Apache::ASP,
