On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Robert Landrum wrote:
[...]
You may want to take a look at Apache::ImageMagick (if you not already
have). It's let's you create thumbnails very easy (just two parameters
pic.xxx/scale?geometry=100x100) and ImageMagick supports over 80 different
formats. It also handles
generator (currently supports only jpeg), which is just a
spiced up implementation of Image::GD::Thumbnail. The second is a
directory index generator, which displays each file name and a link to
the picture, using URIs to the on-the-fly thumbnail generator to show
the previews.
Ideas
I recently decided that Apache::Gallery is really nice if you want to
sit down and start fiddling with templates, but that I needed to make a
quick-easy version for myself. The design is to be extremely simple,
and is divided into two seperate modules. The first is an on-the-fly
thumbnail
modules. The first is an on-the-fly
thumbnail generator (currently supports only jpeg), which is just a
spiced up implementation of Image::GD::Thumbnail.
You may want to take a look at Apache::ImageMagick (if you not already
have). It's let's you create thumbnails very easy (just two
,
and is divided into two seperate modules. The first is an on-the-fly
thumbnail generator (currently supports only jpeg), which is just a
spiced up implementation of Image::GD::Thumbnail.
You may want to take a look at Apache::ImageMagick (if you not already
have). It's let's you create thumbnails
Issac Goldstand [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Part of the idea here is to do everything on-the-fly so that changes
on the filesystem (in terms of adding/removing pictures) will
IMMEDIATELY take effect (including caching, etc) on the web interface.
That means no thumbnails to start with.
Yeah,
ImageMagick is way too slow for use in a production system.
Especially if your resizing large images into thumbnails.
Apache::ImageMagick will cache the created thumbnail, so it only has to be
done once and can it automaticly recreate the thumbnail if the pictures on
disk changes.
Gerald
