On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Stathy G. Touloumis wrote:
Is there an idea of when the TIPool API will be available for mod_perl 2.0?
probably never now that threads::shared has been implemented in perl-5.8,
which can be used to provide the same functionality (i think).
threads::shared came to be after
On Thursday 13 June 2002 10:46 pm, Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Stathy G. Touloumis wrote:
Is there an idea of when the TIPool API will be available for mod_perl
2.0?
probably never now that threads::shared has been implemented in perl-5.8,
which can be used to provide the
On 6/13/02 5:58 PM, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Also note perl.com is now running an article on threads::shared.
http://www.perl.com/pub/a/2002/06/11/threads.html
It's mainly aimed at module authors, but it could be of interest anyway.
Does anyone know the logic behind making the threads modules
On Thursday 13 June 2002 11:37 pm, John Siracusa wrote:
On 6/13/02 5:58 PM, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Also note perl.com is now running an article on threads::shared.
http://www.perl.com/pub/a/2002/06/11/threads.html
It's mainly aimed at module authors, but it could be of interest anyway.
On 6/13/02 6:40 PM, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Does anyone know the logic behind making the threads modules all lowercase?
I'd expect it to be Threads::Shared, not threads::shared.
Pragmas are lowercase. And use threads; is really a pragma.
A pragma with class methods? A pragma that exports
On Thursday 13 June 2002 11:50 pm, John Siracusa wrote:
On 6/13/02 6:40 PM, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Does anyone know the logic behind making the threads modules all
lowercase? I'd expect it to be Threads::Shared, not threads::shared.
Pragmas are lowercase. And use threads; is really a
Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Stathy G. Touloumis wrote:
Is there an idea of when the TIPool API will be available for mod_perl 2.0?
probably never now that threads::shared has been implemented in perl-5.8,
which can be used to provide the same functionality (i think).
We are really having fun here of courseand personally I'm more interested
in
the features than the writing Thread or thread...but perhaps one place
to draw the
line would be
If a directive or hint changes the behavior of the compiler or interpreter
in a
non-reversable fashion then it deserve
