Reuben Fischman wrote:
I'll have to find the time to upgrade to 1.99_12.. If I'm reading the
README correctly, I also need at least Apache 2.0.46, and my installation is
Apache 2.0.40, not to mention it's a RHL 9.0 RPM and they didn't install in
a single tree.
I'm wondering if the upgrade to 1.99_
I'll have to find the time to upgrade to 1.99_12.. If I'm reading the
README correctly, I also need at least Apache 2.0.46, and my installation is
Apache 2.0.40, not to mention it's a RHL 9.0 RPM and they didn't install in
a single tree.
I'm wondering if the upgrade to 1.99_12 will also let me po
sagi wrote:
If I use
PerlOptions None +Log
And in httpd.conf, we do not specify allow override to none, so by
default allow override is ALL, can users override this directive from
inside an htaccess file and set perl handlers?
No, by default it's available everywhere where it's not disa
If I use
PerlOptions None +Log
And in httpd.conf, we do not specify allow override to none, so by
default allow override is ALL, can users override this directive from
inside an htaccess file and set perl handlers?
-Original Message-
From: Stas Bekman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
sagi wrote:
I would like to use a certain module (Apache::Traffic) to log traffic on
a per UID, but since we are a web hosting, we do not want our clients to
be able to use mod_perl. Is there a nice solution that will allow me to
use this module, but will disallow ALL clients from using any feature
Ask Solem Hoel wrote:
On Jan 21, 2004, at 9:55 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
Ask Solem Hoel wrote:
Hi!
I'm trying to track down a memory leak, but when I try PerlModule
B::TerseSize(0.05) with Apache::Status, apache gives me an internal
server error with nothing but:
[...]
When I access /perl-status/
I would like to use a certain module (Apache::Traffic)
to log traffic on a per UID, but since we are a web
hosting, we do not want our clients to be able to use mod_perl.
Is there a nice solution that will allow me to use this module, but will
disallow ALL clients from using any features of
Marc Brooks wrote:
Building an app that runs under mod_perl and have been experiencing some
issues with DNS? "Cannot find server".
Currently running Apache 1.29, mod_perl, mod_ssl, php 1.29 with modules:
Apache::Request
Apache::Sesison
Apache::DBI
Apache::Cookie
Template::Toolkit
The situation is
Reuben Fischman wrote:
I can only get up to the part about removing the Apache::compat dependency.
I get errors about the BEGIN statement not being valid when I try and use
that.
I'm running RH9, mod_perl 1.99-07, Apache 2.0, Perl 5.8.0, and I did the
port using Apache::MP3 3.03..
I think 1.99_07 i
S D wrote:
ok - ldd /opt/ora9/product/9.2/Apache/Apache/bin/httpd
shows:
~~~
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
(0x40034000)
libdb.so.2 => /usr/lib/libdb.so.2 (0x40041000)
libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x4005)
libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0x40065000)
libcrypt.so.1 => /lib/libcry
Building an app that runs under mod_perl and have been experiencing some
issues with DNS? "Cannot find server".
Currently running Apache 1.29, mod_perl, mod_ssl, php 1.29 with modules:
Apache::Request
Apache::Sesison
Apache::DBI
Apache::Cookie
Template::Toolkit
The situation is when I click on .
>
> Oh, I see what you're saying. What's happening is that if I decline,
> it's getting *default*, rather than "what was previously configured".
> Is that what you're saying?
yup.
> Any way to push another content handler
> on the stack, rather than replacing what's there? (Yeah, I can
> rep
Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 22 January 2004 at 14:02:45 -0500
>
> >>the etag and last-modified headers setting has nothing to do with mod_perl
> >>in this case - it's done by default_handler, so if you fallback to
> >>default_handler then you get to deal with its logic and res
>>the etag and last-modified headers setting has nothing to do with mod_perl
>>in this case - it's done by default_handler, so if you fallback to
>>default_handler then you get to deal with its logic and results.
>
>
> That can't be what's happening; *without* my module, the request is
> served
The uploaded file
Apache-AuthenNTLM-2.05.tar.gz
has entered CPAN as
file: $CPAN/authors/id/S/SP/SPEEVES/Apache-AuthenNTLM-2.05.tar.gz
size: 51753 bytes
md5: 21b172f8d9ec971741d6f989e3ac946d
- This version fixes the APR::SockAddr::port_get name change in mod_perl-1.99_12
(found by Michael
I can only get up to the part about removing the Apache::compat dependency.
I get errors about the BEGIN statement not being valid when I try and use
that.
I'm running RH9, mod_perl 1.99-07, Apache 2.0, Perl 5.8.0, and I did the
port using Apache::MP3 3.03..
It DOES work witht the Apache::compat
Shannon Eric Peevey wrote:
I seem to have a problem and am unable to find any forums for some help.
The [EMAIL PROTECTED] list has people who are familiar with this
module, and help maintain it. :)
I have read your docs on AuthenNTLM and also I don't see much in the
way of
examples I think I
Original Message
Subject: Apache-AuthenNTLM-2.04
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 10:37:34 -0800
From: Dooley, Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hello,
I seem to have a problem and am unable to find an
ok - ldd /opt/ora9/product/9.2/Apache/Apache/bin/httpd
shows:
~~~
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
(0x40034000)
libdb.so.2 => /usr/lib/libdb.so.2 (0x40041000)
libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x4005)
libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0x40065000)
libcrypt.so.1 => /lib/libcrypt.so.1 (0x
On Wednesday, 2004-01-21 at 22:53:33 -, Steve Grubb wrote:
> Product: mod_perl
> Versions:1.99_09 / apache 2.0.47
> URL: http://perl.apache.org
> Impact: Daemon Hijacking
> Bug class: Leaked Descriptor
> Vendor notified: Yes
> Fix available: No
> Da
On Jan 21, 2004, at 9:55 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
Ask Solem Hoel wrote:
Hi!
I'm trying to track down a memory leak, but when I try PerlModule
B::TerseSize(0.05) with Apache::Status, apache gives me an internal
server error with nothing but:
[Wed Jan 21 11:29:55 2004] [error] Undefined subroutine
I dunno - I wouldn't even give it that much credit. That's like saying that
you wrote an extension for SSH (say in C), which forks the process write
after it listens, and installs a keysniffer on ssh. Is that a bug? Not
IMHO... Because only a server admin can really do it - it's more
"installing
Lupe Christoph wrote:
Hi!
This was on BUGTRAQ last night. Since I've not seen anything from this
guy on the mod_perl mailing list, I thought I'd forward it.
Somebody should reply to BUGTRAQ. Probably that this is an old version,
that people who want to be secure should not use Beta software, and
Hi there,
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, S D wrote:
> When using LWP::UserAgent module, I get following error :
> /opt/ora9/product/9.2/Apache/Apache/bin/httpd: relocation error:
> /opt/ora9/product/9.2/Apache/perl/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/HTML/Parser/Parser.so:
> undefined s
S D wrote:
When using LWP::UserAgent module, I get following
error :
/opt/ora9/product/9.2/Apache/Apache/bin/httpd:
relocation error:
/opt/ora9/product/9.2/Apache/perl/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/HTML/Parser/Parser.so:
undefined symbol: Perl_Tstack_sp_ptr
Usually that me
When using LWP::UserAgent module, I get following
error :
/opt/ora9/product/9.2/Apache/Apache/bin/httpd:
relocation error:
/opt/ora9/product/9.2/Apache/perl/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/HTML/Parser/Parser.so:
undefined symbol: Perl_Tstack_sp_ptr
The system is Apache v1.3
Hi!
This was on BUGTRAQ last night. Since I've not seen anything from this
guy on the mod_perl mailing list, I thought I'd forward it.
Somebody should reply to BUGTRAQ. Probably that this is an old version,
that people who want to be secure should not use Beta software, and that
it's been fixed f
27 matches
Mail list logo
