Beau E. Cox wrote:
> How do I control how t/config/httpd.conf is setup?
What seems to be the problem?
Well, the t/config/httpd.conf generated somewhere in the mod_perl build -
I couldn't find it on first glance - is based on the
Apache 2.0 configuration, NOT the Apache 2.1 configuration. I am
l
On Tuesday 30 March 2004 05:32 pm, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Beau E. Cox wrote:
> > Hi -
> >
> > I have 2 Apache2s on my test server:
> >
> > Apache 2.0.50-dev(cvs) installed in /home/test/usr/apache2
> >
> > and:
> >
> > Apache 2.1 (cvs) installed in /home/test/usr/apache2.1
>
> Apache 2.1 is not off
Beau E. Cox wrote:
> Hi -
>
> I have 2 Apache2s on my test server:
>
> Apache 2.0.50-dev(cvs) installed in /home/test/usr/apache2
>
> and:
>
> Apache 2.1 (cvs) installed in /home/test/usr/apache2.1
>
> When generating mod perl with:
>
> perl Makefile.PL MP_APXS=/home/test/use/apache2.1/s
Beau E. Cox wrote:
Hi -
I have 2 Apache2s on my test server:
Apache 2.0.50-dev(cvs) installed in /home/test/usr/apache2
and:
Apache 2.1 (cvs) installed in /home/test/usr/apache2.1
Apache 2.1 is not officially supported at the moment. If you want to play with
it you are on your own, Beau. Geo
Garth Webb wrote:
I have a question about Apache::StatINC and reloading exported methods.
Garth, Apache::StatINC is deprecated and no longer maintained. Please use
Apache::Reload instead (mp1 version on CPAN, mp2 version is a part of the core).
> Apparently methods that are exported from a modul
Hi -
I have 2 Apache2s on my test server:
Apache 2.0.50-dev(cvs) installed in /home/test/usr/apache2
and:
Apache 2.1 (cvs) installed in /home/test/usr/apache2.1
When generating mod perl with:
perl Makefile.PL MP_APXS=/home/test/use/apache2.1/sbin/apxs
the test httpd.conf file is generated
I have a question about Apache::StatINC and reloading exported methods.
Apparently methods that are exported from a module do not get reloaded
when the module changes on disk (see the test script and test module
below).
To test this, I start my apache in single process mode via '-X' and
access th
Nick Phillips wrote:
On 30/03/2004, at 5:21 AM, Brian Clarkson wrote:
I'm hoping that I'm doing something wrong ...
I've tried the logout.pl that comes in the Apache::AuthCookie dist,
but that didn't work.
My code has an object that has an Apache::Request object stuffed into
it, and:
I don't
That sounds about right.
I would also recommend adding something to the README for Solaris 8 & 9
indicating that core files may not be generated, even if they normally
would be, depending on the initial ulimit -c setting. I say 8 & 9
because I don't know if the ulimit restriction has always been t
Beau E. Cox wrote:
> On Monday 29 March 2004 11:40 pm, Mads Toftum wrote:
>
>>On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 11:27:34PM -1000, Beau E. Cox wrote:
>>
>>>What is Apache 2.1? Is it available? I can't find reference to it
>>>on apache.org.
>>
>>Apache 2.1 is cvs HEAD - while 2.0.x is BRANCH_2_0. There has
How is the first request identified? Is there a http-session
set, or is it IP-based? How is a client identified?
Basically, this only deals with subrequests for each individual
request. This doesn't set a session for the whole time the user is
interfacing with your application. If you need
> The excerpt from X, (sorry, I forgot their name :( ), uses a
> semaphore
> to maintain the connection, where
>
> 'return OK unless $r->is_initial_req;'
>
> uses a flag in the request object to bypass the
> authentication module if the flag is set. (It is set after
> the first successful pa
Tauber, Mathias HDP wrote:
Sorry for the late answer...
Hmm... My thought would have been that Apache::AuthenCache
would do the
trick... What are the exact symptoms when you use
AuthenCache? Are you
still hitting the Domain controller for every request?
Yes, still like DoS...
:(
On Monday 29 March 2004 11:40 pm, Mads Toftum wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 11:27:34PM -1000, Beau E. Cox wrote:
> > What is Apache 2.1? Is it available? I can't find reference to it
> > on apache.org.
>
> Apache 2.1 is cvs HEAD - while 2.0.x is BRANCH_2_0. There has been
> no releases in 2.1 ye
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 11:27:34PM -1000, Beau E. Cox wrote:
> What is Apache 2.1? Is it available? I can't find reference to it
> on apache.org.
>
Apache 2.1 is cvs HEAD - while 2.0.x is BRANCH_2_0. There has been
no releases in 2.1 yet (mostly waiting for apr 1.0 afaict). The whole
auth system h
Hi -
I guess I haven't been paying attention, but the module
Apache::AuthenHook requires Apache 2.1 - not 2.0, according to
the documentation.
What is Apache 2.1? Is it available? I can't find reference to it
on apache.org.
Aloha => Beau;
--
Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail
16 matches
Mail list logo
