I found a typo where version 1.27 is hardcoded into version 1.29 and so if
you do a
perl -MApache -e 'print $Apache::VERSION' you get 1.27 instead of 1.29.
Attached is a patch.
-m
diff -ruN mod_perl-1.29/Apache/Apache.pm mod_perl-1.29.fixed/Apache/Apache.pm
--- mod_perl-1.29/Apache/Apache.pm
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 12:34:28 -0500, Frank Wiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I've been trying to reach the maintainer of Apache::Singleton with
> very little success. His name is Tatsuhiko Miyagawa
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I supplied him with a patch that makes the
> mo
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:02:06 -0700
Kevin Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 12:34:28 -0500, Frank Wiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > I've been trying to reach the maintainer of Apache::Singleton with
> > very little success. His name is T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I am getting such errors:
[Tue Oct 19 18:36:28 2004] [error] a content filter was added without a
request: includes
for _every_ request when using PerlSetOutputFilter instead of SetOutputFilter
I am using apache 2.0.52 with mp 1.99_16.
The me
Max Baker wrote:
> I found a typo where version 1.27 is hardcoded into version 1.29 and so if
> you do a
>
> perl -MApache -e 'print $Apache::VERSION' you get 1.27 instead of 1.29.
this number is internal to Apache.pm and isn't intended to match the release
version. you can see where doug la
a release candidate for mod_perl 1.99_17 is now available for testing.
please grab the candidate from
http://www.apache.org/~gozer/mp2/mod_perl-1.99_17/mod_perl-1.99_17-RC1.tar.gz
and report back successes or failures. when reporting failures, please see
the bug reporting guidelines at
http:/
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
a release candidate for mod_perl 1.99_17 is now available for testing.
Compiled & works like a charm on NetBSD 1.6.2/i386
with normal (BSD) make even. mp2bug can't find the
httpd binaryu though, but that's pretty minor.
steel1: {15} perl mp2bug
-8<--
Carl Brewer wrote:
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
a release candidate for mod_perl 1.99_17 is now available for testing.
Compiled & works like a charm on NetBSD 1.6.2/i386
with normal (BSD) make even.
Great!
mp2bug can't find the
httpd binaryu though, but that's pretty minor.
Could you post your /dat
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
Could you post your /data/src/modperl-2.0/bin/../lib/Apache/BuildConfig.pm
in it's entirety ?
steel1: {23} cat /data/src/modperl-2.0/bin/../lib/Apache/BuildConfig.pm
#
# /*
# * *** WARNING **
# * This file generated by Apache::Build/0.01
# * Any c
Carl Brewer wrote:
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
a release candidate for mod_perl 1.99_17 is now available for testing.
Compiled & works like a charm on NetBSD 1.6.2/i386
with normal (BSD) make even. mp2bug can't find the
httpd binaryu though, but that's pretty minor.
Did you run bin/mp2bug from t
Carl Brewer wrote:
*** The httpd binary was not found
Please ignore that. It's a bug in Apache-Test that I've introduced and I
know that I need to fix that. It's just far from being trivial. I'm still
sleeping on it. It has nothing to do with mod_perl...
--
__
Stas Bekman wrote:
Carl Brewer wrote:
*** The httpd binary was not found
Please ignore that. It's a bug in Apache-Test that I've introduced and I
know that I need to fix that. It's just far from being trivial. I'm still
sleeping on it. It has nothing to do with mod_perl...
Sure, as I think I also
Torsten Förtsch wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I am getting such errors:
[Tue Oct 19 18:36:28 2004] [error] a content filter was added without a
request: includes
for _every_ request when using PerlSetOutputFilter instead of SetOutputFilter
[...]
The PerlSetOutputFilter
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> a release candidate for mod_perl 1.99_17 is now available for testing.
On Win32 (ActivePerl 810, based on perl 5.8.4), with
Apache/2.0.50, there's a couple of (minor) issues:
- the last test of directive/setupenv.t fails: this tests
that $ENV{HO
Philippe I know your buisy with mod_perl 2 stuff at the moment, but I
hope you get a chance to look at this when your free - unless the author
of the code is someone else and you just recommended it?
Anyway, Let me know.
David
On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 12:25, David Radunz wrote:
> Further to that -
15 matches
Mail list logo