Hi all,
I'm experiencing problems when I run the make command on
mod_perl-1.99_14. I'm including an extract of the output when running
the make.
The OS is AIX 5.2 64-bit, the perl version is 5.8.5 and I'm compiling
using xlC.
Here are the errors I'm receiving...
=
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 10:55:47 +0100
"Crumley, Martin \(GE Infra, Energy\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm experiencing problems when I run the make command on
> mod_perl-1.99_14. I'm including an extract of the output when running
> the make.
Why not using mod_perl 2.0.3? Version 1.99_xx
Hi,
Thanks for the quick response.
Apologies, I should have included the Apache version in the original
mail - it's 2.0.55.
As for mod_perl 2.0.3, I've tried that also with the same result. I
suspect it's a mistake I've made somewhere down the line, possibly with
he linker options I'm using.
T
Hi all
(Cross posted because relevant to both newsgroups)
I'm guessing that some people on this list use the Tiny MCE WYSIWYG
editor (http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/) - it's OSS, it's cross platform
and works really well.
Moxiecode have a number of 'compressors' which gather up all the
(non-image)
hello,
i am doing a little research on adopting Perl into our
dev group.
we are a small team (8) that mostly programming in
Java . since half of the team has a little or ok
knowlege of Perl, we have been experimenting Perl in
smaller projects to avoid a lot of java related
overhead. most of our
hi
i'd encourage you to look into mod_perl as it can be amazing in letting
you get the most out of your hardware.
as far as running multiple unrelated perl apps using mod_perl- i think
it happens every day! you just need to program them accordingly. also,
you can use virtual hosts under apache 1
You should not develop anything new in mod_perl / Apache 1.3
That system is outdated and only receives bugfixes.
Use mp2/Apache2
the environment currently being mp1 is meaningless. mp apps often
work best on their on server, but that doesn't mean a physical
server: run apache2 on an altern
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 12:54:37 -0700 (PDT)
"James. L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mod_perl 2 seems solve the problem with virtual host
> which will require us to adopt apache 2 and use
> virtual host.
>
> my understanding may be false but i would like to hear
> your point of view and help me figur
Hi all,
This is imacat from Taiwan. I wonder if there is a mod_perl bug
database, like bugzilla or rt.cpan.org. I wonder if some bugs were
reported before. If there is one, I could check it before reporting it.
But I could not on the mod_perl website. Did I missed something?
--
Best rega
