Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-SizeLimit 0.91 RC4

2007-03-27 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Geoffrey Young wrote: Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: This release should be the final RC, the same as what would ship in the latest mod_perl 1.30 RC2. http://people.apache.org/~gozer/mp1/Apache-SizeLimit-0.91-rc4.tar.gz This tarball + the docs changes gozer/geoff commited looks good. FreeBSD 6.2

Re: Apache2::compat from mod_perl 2.0.3 -- multiple issues

2007-03-27 Thread Joshua Hoblitt
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 09:02:09AM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote: > Joshua Hoblitt wrote: > > This error is caused by 'Apache2::ServerUtil::server_root' (note that > > missing '()') and this repeated in several places through-out > > compat.pm. > > you are not the first to report this, but I guess

Re: "Insecure dependency in eval while running setgid" error

2007-03-27 Thread Robert Landrum
Fred Moyer wrote: Or maybe this is a bug in getegid where it's not clearing a previous memory state. What platform is this on? sun4-solaris His first post had a list of modules in a stack trace, which is where I grabbed that. I googled, but didn't find anything relevant. :( See if fgre

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-SizeLimit 0.91 RC4

2007-03-27 Thread Geoffrey Young
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: > This release should be the final RC, the same as what would ship > in the latest mod_perl 1.30 RC2. > > http://people.apache.org/~gozer/mp1/Apache-SizeLimit-0.91-rc4.tar.gz looks good (finally :) +1 --Geoff

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-SizeLimit 0.91 RC4

2007-03-27 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Sorry, try again :( The only change here included is: > Fix Can't call method "child_terminate" on an undefined value > By add_cleanup_handler() pass $r to _exit_if_to_big() via shift > [David Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] The rest are still in trunk-unstable. Thats just the changes file though

[RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-SizeLimit 0.91 RC4

2007-03-27 Thread Philippe M. Chiasson
This release should be the final RC, the same as what would ship in the latest mod_perl 1.30 RC2. http://people.apache.org/~gozer/mp1/Apache-SizeLimit-0.91-rc4.tar.gz Changes since 0.9 : *** HEADS UP - SHARED CODE BASE - HEADS UP *** Apache-SizeLimit has been hybridized. I

Re: "Insecure dependency in eval while running setgid" error

2007-03-27 Thread Fred Moyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - I changed a mod_perl page to actually print out gid and egid. Both $( and $) are actually a space seperated list of group ids, what I found is that under mod_perl I get: $GID451 451 $EGID -19253340 451 451 is fliclearusers, the primary group of my account. I ha

Re: "Insecure dependency in eval while running setgid" error

2007-03-27 Thread Perrin Harkins
On 3/27/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Whereas in my production environment, if I access some a new mod_perl page again and again over the course of a few minutes I'm almost guaranteed for users to trigger the error which actually occurs on _another_ mod_perl page which has been

RE: "Insecure dependency in eval while running setgid" error

2007-03-27 Thread Sagar.Shah
Hi Perrin, Thanks again for trying to help. > The only other thing that occurs to me, and this is a reach because > I'm way out of my expertise, is that the problem Stas fixed earlier > had to do with some XS code not leaving things in a good state, and > maybe some XS code in a module you use is

Re: "Insecure dependency in eval while running setgid" error

2007-03-27 Thread Perrin Harkins
On 3/27/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: - It wasn't possible to repeat the error I got when running under httpd -X (well I tried for a long time and couldn't) I'm guessing you just didn't hit the right combination of things. Or maybe this problem is somehow only present after

RE: "Insecure dependency in eval while running setgid" error

2007-03-27 Thread Sagar.Shah
> -Original Message- > From: Shah, Sagar: IT (LDN) > Sent: 26 March 2007 17:30 > To: 'Perrin Harkins' > Cc: 'modperl@perl.apache.org' > Subject: RE: "Insecure dependency in eval while running setgid" error > > > > > Alternatively, if you can run your server in > single-process mode and