> My main problem is: Memory Usage.
> Currently, the apache processes take (each) about 150 MB memory,
> what's quite a lot. Now, i've been wondering which module and why it
> takes that much memory at all.
Check out this thread:
http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/modperl/3173671
Anthony Gardner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Okay, including the new query string in the lookup_uri now correctly
> populates the QUERY_STRING in the sub request but
> that isn;t the answer to my problems.
>
> Within the called script, we make a call to $cgi->Vars but this is
> returning the que
Charlie Katz wrote:
Hi All,
I've been following this discussion closely because I had what seems to be the
same problem Sagar is having.
I started greping around in the mod_perl source code (I have 2.0.2) and found
this in modperl_perl.c:
-
Hi All,
I've been following this discussion closely because I had what seems to be the
same problem Sagar is having.
On Friday 30 March 2007 12:19 pm, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> This might be a silly question, but what makes you think this has to
> do with tainting? If it was a taint problem, woul
note: this is on a machine running freebsd 6.1
i also mistakingly posted this from a not-subscribed address.
hopefully no one will approve that :)
mp2.02
I was running mp2.02 on production , and the recent memory usage had
me to quickly try profiling with apache2::sizelimit (which i haven'
On Mar 30, 2007, at 8:00 AM, Georg Grabler wrote:
Hello list,
I'm developing a quite large project, using SOAP::Lite and some more
modules using mod_perl.
My main problem is: Memory Usage.
If you search the archives using my name, you'll fine a ton of stuff
about me complaining and going
Currently, the apache processes take (each) about 150 MB memory,
what's quite a lot. Now, i've been wondering which module and why it
takes that much memory at all.
Georg,
How do you determine how much memory each Apache process is taking? If
you're on Linux, it's tricky to correctly determine
Hello,
I doubt this is specifically a modperl problem but if not, perhaps someone can
point me to a better group to post this message with?
First, I am using:
modperl 2.0.x
perl 5.8.5
Linux
I have a page on a site where users can upload as many pictures as they like.
I am using the cgi class
> -Original Message-
> From: Perrin Harkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 30 March 2007 17:19
> To: Shah, Sagar: IT (LDN)
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> modperl@perl.apache.org; Client Research Development
> Subject: Re: "Insecure dependency in eval while running setgid
Cool. you're a diamond.
stay tuned for the next problem!!
Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 3/30/07, Anthony Gardner wrote:
> One more question, I had to put the data in notes so that it was available
> in the inital script. Is that the right way to do it?
That's a good way to do it.
On 3/30/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The untainting itself however happens just before the error is thrown,
so think it's more about estabilishing in precisely which conditions the
m// operator loses it's ability to untaint and coming up with the most
trivial demonstration of
> I think I remember saying that so far I've only been testing after
> graceful restarts (so what I would assume u call respawned children).
Again, this may be COMPLETELY unrelated, but I've had some serious
issues with graceful restart and stop in apache 2.2 / 2.4
With graceful restarts, I get
On 3/30/07, Anthony Gardner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One more question, I had to put the data in notes so that it was available
in the inital script. Is that the right way to do it?
That's a good way to do it. I think the alternative is to rig some
kind of filter to capture the output of the
Hi Clinton,
Thanks for your input :)
> -Original Message-
> From: Clinton Gormley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 30 March 2007 16:50
> To: Shah, Sagar: IT (LDN)
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> modperl@perl.apache.org; Client Research Development
> Subject: RE: "Insecure
Ookay. Had a play with initalising the globals and got the thing
working.
One more question, I had to put the data in notes so that it was available in
the inital script. Is that the right way to do it?
Perrin, thanks for all your help on this. I've learnt a lot more, too which is
als
I may have missed your reply somewhere in the thread, but Robert Landrum
asked the question about whether this happens only in children that have
respawned, and I haven't seen you comment about it.
It may be worth adding a call to Apache2::ServerUtil::restart_count()
into the debugging statement.
> -Original Message-
> From: Perrin Harkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 30 March 2007 15:38
> To: Shah, Sagar: IT (LDN)
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; modperl@perl.apache.org; Client
> Research Development
> Subject: Re: "Insecure dependency in eval while running setgid" error
>
> On 3/
On 3/30/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What we found is that sometimes the problem would occur with httpd
processes that had served nothing other than this page and static
content (gifs, js files etc.) .
Okay, and did you try repeating that sequence of requests to see if it
tr
While I dont know if this would help, but faced with a similar
situation, I might try something on the following lines:
1. write a small script that uses SOAP:Lite (may be copy hibye.cgi
from http://guide.soaplite.com/)
2. setup htttpd.conf to use Apache::Status
3. Run apache in single-process mod
Hi Perrin,
> -Original Message-
> From: Perrin Harkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 30 March 2007 14:27
> To: Shah, Sagar: IT (LDN)
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; modperl@perl.apache.org; Client
> Research Development
> Subject: Re: "Insecure dependency in eval while running setgid" erro
On 3/30/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I did this yesterday along with the other debugging. Unfortunately there
doesn't seem to be a sequence of hits. The child process could have
served multiple hits to the page in question or none at all.
You need the sequence this child fol
On 3/30/07, Anthony Gardner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Within the called script, we make a call to $cgi->Vars but this is returning
the query string from the initial request.
That's just a problem with the way CGI.pm is coded. It essentially
doesn't work for subrequests or internal redirects b
On Friday 30 March 2007 14:00, Georg Grabler wrote:
> Initially, the apache processes take 42 MB each (i think this should
> be mostly shared memory and a lot of preloaded projects, as usual on
> a developer machine). If i connect using SOAP, the process jumps up
> to 140-150MB, and i just can't th
Hi Rob,
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Landrum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 29 March 2007 20:14
> To: Shah, Sagar: IT (LDN)
> Cc: modperl@perl.apache.org
> Subject: Re: "Insecure dependency in eval while running setgid" error
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I'm hoping tho tha
Hello list,
I'm developing a quite large project, using SOAP::Lite and some more
modules using mod_perl.
My main problem is: Memory Usage.
Currently, the apache processes take (each) about 150 MB memory,
what's quite a lot. Now, i've been wondering which module and why it
takes that much memory
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 17:31 -0400, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
> On Mar 29, 2007, at 1:01 PM, Perrin Harkins wrote:
>
> > Apache::DBI handles this for you. It checks if you are connection
> > during startup and does not make your connection persistent if you
> > are.
>
> is this new-ish ( like withi
Okay, including the new query string in the lookup_uri now correctly populates
the QUERY_STRING in the sub request but that isn;t the answer to my problems.
Within the called script, we make a call to $cgi->Vars but this is returning
the query string from the initial request. Is it taking that f
27 matches
Mail list logo
