I would even say PER THREAD or PER PERL INTERPRETER.
Indeed, I'm running Per/mod perl under Windows, and there's one unique
Apache process (except the parent one) hosting all perl interpreters.
Something to ask about modperl and memory in Windows. I know modperl uses
threads in Windows. But
Hi Perrin,
No, if the message you're getting is to use globals instead of
lexicals then you've got it all wrong.
- Use lexicals for everything, unless you actually want the value to
persist across requests.
I was thinking, for large amounts of data, about using globals.
Indeed, imagine you
Hi folks,
Recently I needed to track down some slow page-load times on a
production server, so I took the performance hit and stuck Devel::DProf
on it for a few hours, but then had to get an overall picture.
So I wrote a little script to merge multiple tmon.out files - help
yourselves:
Hi folks,
Any idea why Apache::DProf would be failing to list some subroutines
that are definitely being called, in the tmon.out file?
I grepped all sub references from tmon.out and it's listing my method
handlers, it's listing some of my constructors, and its listing some
object methods,
Lionel MARTIN wrote:
- Don't load large amounts of data into scalars.
Fine. Now I know why. But sometimes, you don't have the choice.
I'd like to know what situations you encounter where you are forced to load
large amounts of data into scalars. I can't think of any.
--
Michael Peters
John ORourke wrote:
Hi folks,
Any idea why Apache::DProf would be failing to list some subroutines
that are definitely being called, in the tmon.out file?
I grepped all sub references from tmon.out and it's listing my method
handlers, it's listing some of my constructors, and its listing
Not sure if its relevant, but from general Perl usage, Devel::Profiler
often fails to properly recognise function names if its USE statement
ends up being executed before your classes have been USEd.
If you use factories to instantiate objects from calculated class names,
those methods
Jeff wrote:
Not sure if its relevant, but from general Perl usage, Devel::Profiler
often fails to properly recognise function names if its USE statement
ends up being executed before your classes have been USEd.
If you use factories to instantiate objects from calculated class names,
Original Message
Subject: Re:Apache::DProf missing some subroutines
From: Geoffrey Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: modperl modperl@perl.apache.org
Date: 11 May 2007 14:11:14
Also, Devel::Profiler can't handle many of the DBI implementations (you
have to bad_pkgs=[] them.
I
Jeff wrote:
Original Message
Subject: Re:Apache::DProf missing some subroutines
From: Geoffrey Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: modperl modperl@perl.apache.org
Date: 11 May 2007 14:11:14
Also, Devel::Profiler can't handle many of the DBI implementations (you
have to
i still have few questions, would you please answer
them for me? see below..
--- Perrin Harkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/7/07, James. L [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the files i need to parse are usually in size of
2M -
10M. will the mod_perl server(2G Mem) use up the
memory pretty quick
John ORourke wrote:
Geoffrey Young wrote:
Jeff wrote:
Not sure if its relevant, but from general Perl usage, Devel::Profiler
often fails to properly recognise function names if its USE statement
ends up being executed before your classes have been USEd.
yes, because
hi all :)
I spent some time this week adding hooks for template toolkit into
Devel::Profiler. you can find the code here
http://www.modperlcookbook.org/~geoff/modules/experimental/Devel-Profiler-Plugins-Template-0.01.tar.gz
I'm not entirely convinced of the namespace, which is why it's not on
On 5/11/07, John ORourke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any idea why Apache::DProf would be failing to list some subroutines
that are definitely being called, in the tmon.out file?
Yes. You're probably loading some of your code before initializing
the debugger. Put something like this in
Geoffrey Young wrote:
Jeff wrote:
Not sure if its relevant, but from general Perl usage, Devel::Profiler
often fails to properly recognise function names if its USE statement
ends up being executed before your classes have been USEd.
yes, because Devel::Profiler scans for then during
On 11 May 2007, at 15:31, James. L wrote:
here is my understand and please verify.
say i have sub parse { return
$array_ref_contain_the_data }
does that memory used by the
$array_ref_contain_the_data can be reused by other
mod_perl application too? or it is used only by the
particular
On 5/11/07, Lionel MARTIN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For example, instead of using a my $bigdata in 50 different script, that
could this result in big memory allocation, I would use a unique
$mypack::bigdata in each script, so that each script would share the same
memory address for this
On 5/11/07, James. L [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
even if i am using an iterator object and call it.next
in TT, doesn't TT actually keep the rendered template
page into one variable and dump it to the browser? in
that case, the memory consumed is still equal to the
entire size of the data and
Perrin Harkins wrote:
On 5/11/07, John ORourke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any idea why Apache::DProf would be failing to list some subroutines
that are definitely being called, in the tmon.out file?
Yes. You're probably loading some of your code before initializing
the debugger. Put something
Hi again,
If you have a lot of scripts that, for
example, load large data files, make a module with a sub that you call
to load the files and use it from all your scripts. Pass the data by
reference to the calling scripts. Then you will isolate the large
lexical in that one module.
Better
Lionel MARTIN wrote:
- Don't load large amounts of data into scalars.
Fine. Now I know why. But sometimes, you don't have the choice.
I'd like to know what situations you encounter where you are forced to
load
large amounts of data into scalars. I can't think of any.
I don't have any
On 11 May 2007, at 17:57, Lionel MARTIN wrote:
Lionel MARTIN wrote:
- Don't load large amounts of data into scalars.
Fine. Now I know why. But sometimes, you don't have the choice.
I'd like to know what situations you encounter where you are
forced to load
large amounts of data into
Lionel MARTIN wrote:
Lionel MARTIN wrote:
- Don't load large amounts of data into scalars.
Fine. Now I know why. But sometimes, you don't have the choice.
I'd like to know what situations you encounter where you are forced to
load
large amounts of data into scalars. I can't think of any.
Lionel MARTIN wrote:
I'll see what I can do when the problem arises, but of course, I now
know I should better avoid loading too much data in RAM at once, because
of data persistance.
Not to be too picky, but just so it's clear to everyone and to future readers of
the archives:
The issue
That's not really large data -- you're talking about dealing with
10-300k per request ( it should never go beyond that, because you'd
be chunking stuff off the db for ease of download to the end user ).
I've been under the impression ( and I'd imagine that others on this
list are as
Hi,
I think you got me wrong.
My initial question was basically something like how could I preserve/give
back memory if needed (i.e. in rare situations) and the reply turned up
into a don't use large scalars. (which is relevant, I agree, but was not
directly replying my initial question)
Obviously, for the second case, I'm assuming that you would do these
things on a small percentage of your total requests, otherwise killing
off your child would be a major bottleneck.
Here, as well, killing a child process under Windows, means killing my whole
Apache server (and so
(sorry, I posted the message below from another email address hours ago, and
it didn't get publish - see below if anyone could reply)
On May 10, 2007, at 6:52 PM, Andy Armstrong wrote:
On 10 May 2007, at 23:48, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
that also means that variables are sticky -- if you
-another example hat comes to my mind is a project (implemented in PHP)
where I had to work. Part of the process was retrieving cached HTML
template pages from the server and do BB tags parsing before serving the
client. Of course, you would tell me that I could retrieve the data
chunk by
On 11 May 2007, at 19:07, Lionel MARTIN wrote:
-another example hat comes to my mind is a project (implemented
in PHP) where I had to work. Part of the process was retrieving
cached HTML template pages from the server and do BB tags
parsing before serving the client. Of course, you would
--- Perrin Harkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/11/07, James. L [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
even if i am using an iterator object and call
it.next
in TT, doesn't TT actually keep the rendered
template
page into one variable and dump it to the browser?
in
that case, the memory consumed
--- Perrin Harkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/10/07, Andy Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless I'm misunderstanding you that's not true.
When a value's
reference count goes to zero the memory is freed -
at least to Perl
if not to the OS.
No, it's not. I know it's
Can you guys please tell me how to unsubscribe.. I've tried all means but have
been unable to.
Thanks,
Kiran
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Perrin
Harkins
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 6:05 PM
To: James. L
Cc: modperl@perl.apache.org
Subject:
--- Perrin Harkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/11/07, James. L [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/10/07, Andy Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless I'm misunderstanding you that's not true.
When a value's
reference count goes to zero the memory is freed -
at least to Perl
if not to
On 5/11/07, James. L [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sorry, i wasn't clear. I understand that memory
allocated by a lexical variable(not reference) can be
released to perl. as described by the practical
modperl link you posted.
I would expect that both behave the same however you
are saying a
Why am I getting these emails even after unsubscribing?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Perrin Harkins
Sent: Fri 5/11/2007 8:53 PM
To: James. L
Cc: modperl@perl.apache.org
Subject:Re: After retrieving data from DB, the memory doesn't seem to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why am I getting these emails even after unsubscribing?
I unsubscribed this person.
--
Joe Schaefer
37 matches
Mail list logo
