Hi All,
I have written a POP3 protocol-handler which uses the
PerlProcessConnectionHandler. The solution worked fine under
Apache 2.0 and ModPerl 2.0, but after an upgrade to
Apache 2.2 and Mod_Perl 2.0.2 it doesn't work correctly.
(We upgraded from Ubuntu-Dapper to Ubuntu-Gutsy).
Specificall
As of patch 32953 dtrace support is in bleadperl (5.11.0). The probes
are based on Alan Burlinson's original blog post on the subject:
http://blogs.sun.com/alanbur/date/20050909
By guarding the probes with PERL_SUB_*_ENABLED the performance hit is
unmeasurable.
All the necessary bits a
Hi folks I know this is off topic and hopefully if anybody knows the
sendmail mailing list address please reply.
My problem is that emails are going out slower and our mail queue is
pretty huge.
Would it be good performance wise to lower the MinQueue Age time to 1
hour instead of 3
therefore
Tyler Bird wrote:
Hi folks I know this is off topic and hopefully if anybody knows the
sendmail mailing list address please reply.
Yeah, that's pretty off-topic.
http://www.sendmail.org/misc/usenet.php
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.mail.sendmail/topics
Colin
On 12 Jan 2008, at 01:32, Bryan Cantrill wrote:
So, Perl folks: if you can do it, a ustack helper is the way to
go. It's
brutal, but the payoff is substantial, as it will be much easier to
connect
misbehaving Perl to the symptoms of that misbehavior elsewhere in the
system. If you're inter
Hello,
I met a strange requirement that, given Apache has two virtual hosts, vhA and
vhB, vhA's document root is: /path/a/; vhB's document root is: /path/b/.
vhA's programs are running under /path/a/cgi-bin, but actually, the programs of
vhA can access vhB's directory (ie,they can open and writ
Jeff Pang wrote:
I met a strange requirement that, given Apache has two virtual hosts,
vhA and vhB, vhA's document root is: /path/a/; vhB's document root
is: /path/b/.
vhA's programs are running under /path/a/cgi-bin, but actually, the
programs of vhA can access vhB's directory (ie,they can open
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 11:24:00PM -0500, Colin Wetherbee wrote:
>
> How about suexec? I used it quite some time ago, and it was awful to
> use, but it got the job done.
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_suexec.html
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/programs/suexec.html
>
I pre
-Original Message-
>From: Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>I prefer to run multiple httpd processes on high numbered ports (one for
>each site), then have the main httpd on port 80 do proxypass
>proxypassrever and name-based vhosting. Then you can also customize
>each httpd to o
On Jan 11, 2008 10:57 PM, Jeff Pang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I met a strange requirement that, given Apache has two virtual hosts, vhA and
> vhB, vhA's document root is: /path/a/; vhB's document root is: /path/b/.
>
> vhA's programs are running under /path/a/cgi-bin, but actually, the programs
10 matches
Mail list logo
